My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00596
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00596
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:26:49 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:50:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8276.200
Description
Paradox Valley Unit - Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
4
Date
7/7/1986
Title
Finding of No Significant Impact For Deep-Well Injection Testing Program
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />public use of the wilderness area, will be addressed in <br />environmental assessments or environmental iIrpact statements, as <br />appropriate. Mitigation of impacts fran outside wilderness will <br />not be so restrictive as to preclude or seriously impede such <br />activities. Sare mitigation is reccmrended to minimize these <br />potential impacts. For example, muted earth-tone colors could be <br />used on the buildings and structures. Structures could be <br />low-profile. Access could be kept to a minimum width and located <br />such that cuts and fills don't daninate views. If the project is <br />abandoned, plans should be made now for full reclamation." <br /> <br />We strongly urge that Jreasures which minimize iIrpacts fran outside the WSA be <br />analyzed in the ~ and iIrplemented. <br /> <br />Response: <br /> <br />As stated in the assessment, the construction of the unit would terrporarily <br />affect the visual and audio values of the wilderness Study Area, but the noise <br />levels would be kept within current Federal guidelines and visual iIrpacts would <br />be kept to a minimum. Also, as stated in the assessment, on canpletion of the <br />test and, if it is determined to be a success, a supplement to the Final <br />Environmental Statement will be written describing any long-term impacts that <br />would be expected with the unit. <br /> <br />2l. Ccmrent: <br /> <br />l. What are the regional hydraulic properties of the Leadville limestone and <br />Ouray and Elbert formations? Are they hydraulically connected to other <br />formations, where do they outcrop, etc.? <br /> <br />Response: <br /> <br />This test is designed to determine the hydraulic properties of these formations. <br />The formations outcrop many miles outside of the area of influence of the <br />injection well. <br /> <br />22. Ccmrent: <br /> <br />2. The OCR needs to develop an emergency spill plan and plan of reclamation, in <br />case waste pits becare threatened by floodwaters or their proposed berm is lost <br />or breached. <br /> <br />Response: <br /> <br />The contractor, once selected, would prepare a spill prevention plan that would <br />be reviE!W'ed and approved by Reclamation prior to iIrplementation. <br /> <br />23. Ccmrent: <br /> <br />3. Is the access road on public lands? <br />to the Dolores River? What drainage <br />incorporated into the access road design, <br /> <br />If so, where is it located in relation <br />and flood control features would be <br />12" pipeline, and powerline? <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />t,l o. il'7:) <br />v,'- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.