Laserfiche WebLink
<br />OOZlxt;j <br /> <br />Mining, Conversion, and Processing Alternatives <br /> <br />Coal mining, conversion, and processing aiternatives will be limited to <br />technologies potentially appl icable to the Yampa River basin. It will be <br />essential to determine the impacts of these alternatives' on the quantity and <br />quality of the Yampa River and its tributaries, This will require an estimate <br />of the types and amounts of residuals generated by coal mining and associated <br />activities. Residualswill vary with the size and location of mining activi- <br />ties. Models exist, or can be adapted, to estimate the impacts of different- <br />sized processes (N, C, Matalas, written commun, , 1976). For the residuals- <br />management analysis, the additional effort required to model all the many pro- <br />posals does not seem justified, However, for the basin assessment, the use of <br />site-specific information will be necessary, particularly for the mining pro- <br />cess where projected coal-mining levels are documented (U,S. Bureau of Land <br />Management and U.S. Geological Survey, written commun., 1976), <br /> <br />For the residuals-management analysis, coal mining is assumed to occur <br />from an even integer number of strip mines each producing 3,125x106 tons <br />(2.84xI06 t) per year (N. C. Matalas, written cOmmun., 1976). This assumption <br />is based on the estimated scale of coal mines in northwestern Colorado (U,S. <br />Bureau of land Management and U,S. Geological Survey, written commun" 1976). <br />Thus, two hypothetical mines, each supplying coal of the type found in the <br />Williams Fork Mountains in the YampaRiver basin, will supply the 6.25xl06 <br />tons (5.68xI06 t) per xear required for either a standard-sized coal-gasifi- <br />cation plant of 250xl0 cubic feet (?lx106 m3) per day (Forney and McGee, <br />1972) or a standard 2,000-megawatt electric-power plant which will operate' <br />under the highest levels of environmental control (N. C,' Matalas, written <br />commun" 1976). Under less strict environmental controls, the excess coal <br />will be assumed to ,be marketed for out-of-basin consumption. Each plant will <br />be assumed to be suppl ied with one-half of the coal required from a mine lo- <br />cated next to the plant with transportation of the other one-half of the re- <br />quired coal from a neighboring mine, <br /> <br />It is assumed that possible coal-gasification plants for the Yampa River <br />basin will use the SYNTHANE conversion process (Forney and McGee, 1972) and be <br />operated within the ranges of temperatures and pressures for which data col- <br />lected under controlled laboratory conditions prior to construction of pilot~ <br />scale plant facil ities have been obtained, It is assumed that the electric <br />power-generating plants will use conversion processes and operating procedures <br />the same as the p resen t state of techno logy. I tal so is assumed tha t the pow- <br />er-generating capacities of the electric power-generating plants will be ap- <br />proximately 1,200 megawatts. The validity of the last assumption is supported <br />by electric-power plants at Craig and Hayden being expanded and under construc- <br />tion, respectively, Sometime near 1982, proposed power-generating capacities <br />at the Craig plant will be 1,070 megawatts; at the Hayden plant, 1,330 mega- <br />watts (U,S. Bureau of Mines and U,S, Environmental Protection Agency, 1975), <br />Although the power-generating capacities of the electric-power plants are fix- <br />ed for the residuals-management analysis, computer programs that define the <br />impact of plants of different power-generating capacities will have to be mod- <br />i fied. <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />..i!. :.<,tj; <br />