|
<br />OOZlxt;j
<br />
<br />Mining, Conversion, and Processing Alternatives
<br />
<br />Coal mining, conversion, and processing aiternatives will be limited to
<br />technologies potentially appl icable to the Yampa River basin. It will be
<br />essential to determine the impacts of these alternatives' on the quantity and
<br />quality of the Yampa River and its tributaries, This will require an estimate
<br />of the types and amounts of residuals generated by coal mining and associated
<br />activities. Residualswill vary with the size and location of mining activi-
<br />ties. Models exist, or can be adapted, to estimate the impacts of different-
<br />sized processes (N, C, Matalas, written commun, , 1976). For the residuals-
<br />management analysis, the additional effort required to model all the many pro-
<br />posals does not seem justified, However, for the basin assessment, the use of
<br />site-specific information will be necessary, particularly for the mining pro-
<br />cess where projected coal-mining levels are documented (U,S. Bureau of Land
<br />Management and U.S. Geological Survey, written commun., 1976),
<br />
<br />For the residuals-management analysis, coal mining is assumed to occur
<br />from an even integer number of strip mines each producing 3,125x106 tons
<br />(2.84xI06 t) per year (N. C. Matalas, written cOmmun., 1976). This assumption
<br />is based on the estimated scale of coal mines in northwestern Colorado (U,S.
<br />Bureau of land Management and U,S. Geological Survey, written commun" 1976).
<br />Thus, two hypothetical mines, each supplying coal of the type found in the
<br />Williams Fork Mountains in the YampaRiver basin, will supply the 6.25xl06
<br />tons (5.68xI06 t) per xear required for either a standard-sized coal-gasifi-
<br />cation plant of 250xl0 cubic feet (?lx106 m3) per day (Forney and McGee,
<br />1972) or a standard 2,000-megawatt electric-power plant which will operate'
<br />under the highest levels of environmental control (N. C,' Matalas, written
<br />commun" 1976). Under less strict environmental controls, the excess coal
<br />will be assumed to ,be marketed for out-of-basin consumption. Each plant will
<br />be assumed to be suppl ied with one-half of the coal required from a mine lo-
<br />cated next to the plant with transportation of the other one-half of the re-
<br />quired coal from a neighboring mine,
<br />
<br />It is assumed that possible coal-gasification plants for the Yampa River
<br />basin will use the SYNTHANE conversion process (Forney and McGee, 1972) and be
<br />operated within the ranges of temperatures and pressures for which data col-
<br />lected under controlled laboratory conditions prior to construction of pilot~
<br />scale plant facil ities have been obtained, It is assumed that the electric
<br />power-generating plants will use conversion processes and operating procedures
<br />the same as the p resen t state of techno logy. I tal so is assumed tha t the pow-
<br />er-generating capacities of the electric power-generating plants will be ap-
<br />proximately 1,200 megawatts. The validity of the last assumption is supported
<br />by electric-power plants at Craig and Hayden being expanded and under construc-
<br />tion, respectively, Sometime near 1982, proposed power-generating capacities
<br />at the Craig plant will be 1,070 megawatts; at the Hayden plant, 1,330 mega-
<br />watts (U,S. Bureau of Mines and U,S, Environmental Protection Agency, 1975),
<br />Although the power-generating capacities of the electric-power plants are fix-
<br />ed for the residuals-management analysis, computer programs that define the
<br />impact of plants of different power-generating capacities will have to be mod-
<br />i fied.
<br />
<br />II
<br />
<br />..i!. :.<,tj;
<br />
|