Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Operation of the existing Gould Reservoir would <br />be integrated in project operation. Project water <br />as well as present supplies would be released <br />from the reservoir to the existing Gould Canal and <br />several small existing ditches. <br /> <br />Laterals would be constructed to distribute water <br />from Fruitland Canal to full serVice lands. Land <br />drains would be constructed wherever the need for <br />them is demonstrated in project operations. <br /> <br />Fishery pools- would be maintained <br />Goodwin Lake and Gould Reservoir. <br />flows would be maintained in' Soap <br /> <br />in both Milly K. <br />Minimum fishery <br />and Curecanti <br /> <br />January 1981 <br />1'.age 2 of 2 <br /> <br />Creeks. Recreational f€lcilities '''QuId be pr.ovided <br />and operated by the Forest Service at Milly K. <br />Goodwin Lake and in Little Soap Park. <br /> <br />A pipeline would be constructed by the National Park <br />Service to convey a small amount of project water <br />from the Fruitland Carial for public use at the <br />Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Monument. <br />Water would be provided to the Bureau of Land Manage- <br />ment (BLM) at the terminus of the Gould Canal for <br />livestock and wildlife use in the Black Ridge area <br />on lower Fruitland Mesa. Conveyance of this water <br />would be the responsibility of Blk!. <br /> <br />STATISTICS (Preliminary) <br />(Taken from Definite Plan Report, August 1977--not official) <br /> <br />WATER SUPPLY <br /> <br />Irrigation supplies (acre-feet) <br />Effects on Colorado River <br />Increase in salt load (tons) <br />Stream depletiOn (acre-feet) <br />Increase in salinity con- <br />centration at Imperial <br />Dam (mgIL) <br />Increase in salt load <br />From concentration'due <br />to stream depletion <br /> <br />45,400 <br /> <br />10,930 <br />21,300 <br /> <br />1.2 <br /> <br />2.6 <br /> <br />IRRIGATION SERVIC~ AREA (acres) <br /> <br />Full service laud <br />Supplemental service land <br />Total <br /> <br />11,940 <br />6,310 <br />18,250 <br /> <br />PROJECT FEATURES <br /> <br />Soap Park Dam <br />Height (feet) <br />Crest length (feet) <br />Milly K. Goodwin Lake capacity <br />(acre-feet) <br />Active <br />Inactive and de~d <br />Total <br /> <br />254 <br />1,170 <br /> <br />50,165 <br />....1..D2 <br />51,400 <br /> <br />Crystt1l <br />Creelt <br /> <br />Curecanti <br />Creek <br /> <br />Diversion Dams <br />Overflow crest length <br />(feet) <br />Diversion capacity <br />(second-feet) <br /> <br />Distribution <br />Black Mesa Conduit <br />Pipeline section <br />Tunnel section <br />Fruitland Canal <br />Laterals <br /> <br />60 10 <br />250 250 <br /> Diversion <br />Length capacity <br />(miles) (ds) <br />10.9 275 <br />2.5 275 <br />8.4 275 <br />18.8 275 <br />13.6 4 to 25 <br /> <br />ESTIMATED COSTS <br /> <br />Construction Costs <br />(January 1976 prices) <br />Soap Park Dam and <br />Milly K. Goodwin Lake <br />Crystal Creek Diversion Pam <br />Curecanti Creek Diversion Dam <br />Black Nesa Conduit <br />Fruitland Canal <br />Gould Canal structures improvement <br />Laterals <br />Drains <br />Transmission lines <br />Permanent operating facilities <br />Operation and maintenance <br />building--Soap Park Dam <br />Public land disposition <br />Access roads to public lands <br />Recreation facilities <br />Specific fish and wildlife <br />faeilitLes <br />Service f~cilities <br />(depreciation and salvage) <br />Toea1 cost <br /> <br />Annual operation, maintenance <br />and replacement costs <br /> <br />$23,000,000 <br />670,000 <br />200,000 <br />42,700,000 <br />7,-550,000 <br />610,000 <br />2,300,000 <br />525,000 <br />270,000 <br />440,000 <br /> <br />80,000 <br />300,000 <br />625,000 <br />670,000 <br /> <br />4,300,000 <br /> <br />-40,000 <br />$84,200,000 <br /> <br />$154,000 <br />