My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00569
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00569
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:26:38 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:50:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8449.860
Description
South Platte Projects - Metropolitan Denver Water Study
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Date
1/1/1985
Author
USACOE
Title
Metropolitan Denver Water Supply Environmental Impact Statement - Appendix 4 and 4b - Water Sources For Future Supply
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />" <br /> <br />ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS <br /> <br />The environmental descriptions and analyses address 16 disci- <br />plines. The disciplines include hydrology; channel stability; water <br />quality; aquatic life; wetlands and riparian aneas; topography, physio- <br />graphy, and geology; soils; vegetation; wildlife; threatened snd <br />endangered species; visual resources; recreation; socioeconomics; <br />transportation; land use; and cultural resources. The environmental <br />analysis process was designed to determine and evaluate potential <br />environmental effects; present findings in a manner that would allow <br />crucial issues to emerge; and develop mitigation. options and cost <br />estimates. for potentially significant impacts. Data used to determine <br />the existing environmental conditions and to estimate future changes <br />were obtained from the engineering analysis and from existing environ- <br />mental Information. A standardized set of environmental evaluation <br />criteria was developed and applied uniformly to all water supply <br />sources. The evaluation criteria were. developed to quantitatively <br />address specific conventional and special-concern issues for each <br />environmental discipline. The quantitative changes were ususlly <br />expressed as changes in acreages or the number of resource features. <br />The quantitative estimates were supplemented with qualitative evalua- <br />tions. Costs of mitigating or compensating potentially significant <br />impacts to each discipline were developed whenever a significant impact <br />was identified. Data for developing the cost estimates were derived <br />from technical literature describing practical snd effective measures. <br /> <br />INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS <br /> <br />The institutional charscterization and evaluations of each water <br /> <br />supply source were evaluated in terms of institutional feasibility, <br /> <br /> <br />ease of implementation, and potential side effects. Examples of <br /> <br />potential institutional constraints include requirements for long-term <br /> <br /> <br />managerial coordination between various wster supply entities and <br /> <br /> <br />requirements to obtain approvals for cooperstion among public agencies <br /> <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.