My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00531
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00531
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:26:26 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:49:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.766
Description
Gunnison River General
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
8/1/1987
Author
BLM
Title
Gunnison Basin and the American Flats-Silverton Wilderness - Final Environmental Impact Statement
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
271
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~lternatives Including the Proposed ~ction <br /> <br />on the limited amount of information <br />known. ~ favorable economic and <br />technologic environment would have to exist <br />before any actual development would occur. <br /> <br />In the Redcloud Peak, Handies Peak and <br />~merican Flats WS~s, there is an extensive <br />amount of existing mining claims, <br />particul arly in those areas with high <br />potential for discovery. The validity of <br />these claims is unknown at this time and <br />would only be determined when a plan for <br />development is submitted to BlM. However, <br />it is assumed that given the large number <br />of claims and the high potential s of the <br />areas for discovery, that a certain number <br />of these claims would ultimately be found <br />to have valid existing rights. Except as <br />specifically identified in the following <br />discussions, these valid claims are <br />predicted to be sufficient to allow for the <br />same levels of mineral development with or <br />without wilderness designation. <br /> <br />Within the Redel oud Peak WS~. alternati ves <br />address the development of an alunite <br />deposit located in the eastern portion of <br />the WS~ on Red Mountain. ~ssumptions have <br />been made regarding whether or not the <br />deposit would be developed under each <br />alternative. ~t this point there is no way <br />of knowing if development will or will not <br />take place. ~ discussion of the history of <br />this development is necessary in order to <br />understand the potential for any activity <br />taking place. <br /> <br />Earth Science, Inc. applied for a <br />preference right lease of 1,667 acres of <br />public land for the purpose of developing a <br />deposit of alunite (potassium aluminum <br />sulfatel. ~uthorization to prospect for <br />leasable minerals is granted through the <br />issuance of a prospecting permit. If a <br />deposit of a valuable mineral is discovered <br />as a resul t of prospecting, and if the land <br />is chiefly valuable for that mineral, a <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />Redcloud Peak <br /> <br />lease shall be issued to the applicant. <br />Earth Selence, Inc. originally applied for <br />a prospecting permit in 1970 and it was <br />issued in 1974. Exploration drilling <br />comprised of three drill holes varying in <br />depth from 306 feet to 6BB feet, was <br />completed in 197B. In March of 1979, Earth <br />Science, Inc. submitted the "Initial <br />Showing" for a preference right lease <br />application. <br /> <br />~ condition in the prospecting permit <br />issued to Earth Science stipulated that <br />unless the deposit could be mined without <br />signi ficant adverse en vi ronmental effects, <br />no lease would be issued. <br /> <br />During preparation of the envi ronmental <br />assessment to analyze impacts of the <br />alunite proposal the Congress placed a <br />prohibition on the processing of all leases <br />within wilderness study areas. <br />Consequently the E~ and deci sf on on whether <br />or not to issue a lease has been put on <br />hold. Therefore it has become necessary to <br />speculate on the likelihood of development <br />for the purposes of the analysis in this <br />EIS. <br /> <br />Uncertainties related to the potential <br />development of the alunite include making <br />the decision discussed above; specifically <br />whether it can be mined without significant <br />adverse effects. If it is determined that <br />it can be and a lease is issued, the <br />company must also submit a "Final Showing" <br />that documents that the alunite can be <br />economically extracted. There is no <br />indication at this time that this condition <br />coul d be met. <br /> <br />If all the conditions in the leasing <br />process are met there would be a valid <br />existing right that would allow development <br />even with wilderness designation. <br /> <br />Given the above there is no way to state <br />with certainty that the deposit would or <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.