Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />'. <br />1 <br />~ <br />it <br />J <br />~ <br />t <br />, <br />1 <br />~ <br />:; <br />.}' <br />s <br />~ <br /> <br />LEEDS. HILL AND JEWETr. INC. <br /> <br />there be any room for expanded municipal and industrial uses of water <br /> <br />in Colorado. The great mineral resources of western Colorado would <br /> <br />have to remain undeveloped because of lack of water if the premise of <br /> <br />the Special Master be valid. <br /> <br />The impact on New Mexico would be more severe because the <br /> <br />projected depletions in New Mexico would exceed its share (11. 25 per cent) <br /> <br />of the supply available to the Upper Basin by about 1975, as shown in <br /> <br />Table C. Depletions by existing projects and the Participating Projects <br /> <br />under construction would then amount to 88,000 -acre feet per year. The <br /> <br />New Mexico share of losses from the Storage Project Reservoirs now <br /> <br />under construction will be about 78,000 acre feet per year. This leaves <br /> <br />only about 280,000 acre feet per year for all other projects in New <br /> <br />Mexico. <br /> <br />The San Juan-Chama Project, proposed for early construction, <br /> <br />would deplete Colorado River by 110,000 acre feet per year. Depletions <br /> <br />due to the proposed Navajo Project are expected to amount to 125,000 <br /> <br />acre feet in 1975, and within ten years later to 252,000 acre feet per <br /> <br />year. It is apparent that there would not be sufficient water for both <br /> <br />of these projects, if California uses are not to be curtailed under the <br /> <br />decree recommended by the Special Master to the Supreme Court of <br /> <br />the United States. <br /> <br />The impact on Utah would be even more severe because projected <br /> <br />depletions in this State, shown on Table D, would exceed its share of <br /> <br />4,000,000 acre feet per year prior to 1975. Depletions by existing <br /> <br />-8- <br />