Laserfiche WebLink
<br />..... <br />co <br />w <br />.;:... <br /> <br />II SUMMARY <br /> <br />The capital requirements and cost of producing fresh water were <br /> <br />determined for six leading desalination processes; the results are given <br /> <br />in Table 1. In the body of the report the major cost elements of each <br /> <br />conversion process are identified. The effects of varying important proc- <br /> <br />ess parameters on water costs are shown for each process. <br /> <br />The costs estimated for the six subject processes must be viewed <br />with varying degrees of confidence, dependent on such factors as the <br /> <br />size of existing plants, the level of knowledge, and the potential for <br /> <br />further improvement. Studies such as this one involve considerable ex- <br /> <br />trapolation of the scale of production and deal with a number of operat- <br /> <br />ing variables that have not been rigidly fixed. The reliability of cost <br />data is probably highest for the multistage flash distillation process, <br /> <br />since the largest desalination plants constructed to date have been of <br /> <br />that design, and the process has received considerable attention from a <br /> <br />research and engineering standpoint. The cost reliability would probably <br /> <br />be progressively slightly less for the vapor compression, vertical tube <br /> <br />evaporator, electrodialysis, vacuum-freeze vapor-compression, and reverse <br /> <br />osmosis processes. <br /> <br />Both the variation in capital and operating costs and the different <br /> <br />quality of inland brackish waters indicate that each process will probably <br /> <br />have areas of application where it is superior to the other processes. An <br /> <br />estimate is given in Table 2 of the feed water properties and plant capac- <br /> <br />ities that would provide the most favorable application area for each <br /> <br />process. <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />