My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00433
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00433
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:26:00 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:45:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8141.600.20
Description
Fryingpan-Arkansas Project - Studies - Environmental Studies
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
5
Date
4/16/1975
Author
US DoI BoR
Title
Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 2 of 2, Pages XI-422 to XI-519
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.0') <br />';)}.Q" <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />thoughtful recommendations for adequate range i~act damage mitigation. <br />This has not been done. Further, wildlife range impact damage in <br />the collection schemes of both the north and south side systems have <br />not received other than oblique and cursory comment. <br /> <br />Raised by: <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Representinll <br /> <br />Edwin Merrick <br /> <br />National Wildlife Federation <br /> <br />Response: <br /> <br />The Bureau of Reclamation's concern for the preservation of the <br />environment and fish and wildlife on the Project has been a major <br />force in the planning and construction phases." Early in the stages <br />of development and during past planning activitiea of the Project, <br />many Federal and State agencies have assisted and contributed information. <br /> <br />The Project's West Slope features, except Ruedi Dam and Reservoir, are <br />located at the relatively high altitude of 10,000 feet and do not make <br />up a large area of winter range for deer and elk. There, the collection <br />system is comprised of tunnels, buried conduits, diversion structures <br />and access roads which do not iapede the movement of wildlife. The <br />collection systems were specifically designed in this manner to reduce <br />interference with wildlife movements. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The effects of operation of Ruedi Dam and Reservoir on fish and wildlife <br />were evaluated by the Fish and Wildlife Service with the cooperation <br />of the Colorado Division of Wildlife. The report concludad that the' <br />influence of these structures on big game and upland game would be <br />insignificant, but some habitat 10s8es for waterfowl and aqua~ic <br />animals would occur through inundation of the three original saall <br />ponds. <br /> <br />Mt. Elbert Conduit, a buried pipe on the eastern slope, has been <br />substituted for by its alternate the Mt. Elbert Canal. The buried <br />system eliminates the need for fencing and gaDe ~r08aing atructures <br />and pemits unrestricted movement of game anima18. The selection of <br />the buried pipeline to carry the water was greatly influenced by <br />environmental and wildlife reasons. There will be soae game migration <br />interference associated with the Otero Canal in spite of the game <br />crossings to be provided. Deer and elk winter range in the vicinity <br />of Twin Lakes and Mt. Elbert Forebay will be adversely affected. <br />See Cl:tapter IV. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />XI-44l <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.