My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00433
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00433
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:26:00 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:45:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8141.600.20
Description
Fryingpan-Arkansas Project - Studies - Environmental Studies
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
5
Date
4/16/1975
Author
US DoI BoR
Title
Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 2 of 2, Pages XI-422 to XI-519
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />,.... " <br />-.; J.. . ..r <br />SUBJECT: AESTHETICS <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1. Issue: Is the Project going to conserve the scenery and natural <br />setting? The environmental statement appears to contradict the <br />conservation of the aestheticso <br /> <br />Raised by: <br /> <br />Name <br /> <br />'Representing <br /> <br />Joseph Edwards <br />"'Tam Scott <br />"'Stacy Standley <br /> <br />Pitkin County Commissioners <br />Colorado Rivers Council <br />Mayor of Aspen <br /> <br />Response: <br /> <br />Section 4(a) of the Authorizing Act directs and'authorizes the Secretary, <br />among other things, to conserve the scenery on lands withdrawn or acquired <br />for the development of the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project. Therefore, con- <br />struction specifications include requirements'for landscape preservation <br />and related environmental requirements. Some modifications in project <br />features for this purpose have been made and incorporated in the work. <br />These changes are reflected in the following features: burying penstocks <br />and other environmental consideration for Mt. Elbert Pumped-Storage and <br />Otero Powerplants, Carter Tunnel system replacing a conduit alternate, <br />seeding and reforestation, improved appearance in the structures for <br />the power system, minimum standards for access roads and selection of <br />only bare essential roads needed for construction and operation and <br />maintenance, adoption of an all-tunnel system for Hunter Tunnel which <br />excludes use of access roads, and for scenery preservation associated <br />with construction of the municipal and industrial delivery systems.' <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MT. F.lhATlT Pllmr~r1-8"t0!1~g~ ?0~O:O!lpl~~1.:: 0n. 1.::h~ !!0!'"!:h ~h0!"~ 0f ~i!! ~:..lt:~=: <br />was designed as a low silhouette structure primarily to blend with the <br />natural setting. This required additional costs for the structureo <br />In developing the project plans involving Forest Service lands' <br />or on withdrawn lands to be turned over to that agency, the Bureau of <br />Reclamation cooperated with the Forest Service and followed their <br />recommendations. <br /> <br />2. Issue: Scars and devastation has come about in the Fryingpan Valley. <br />Up to the time that the Bureau came in,it was a very beautiful valley. <br />Now it is a hideous mass of scars that have been developed by the Ruedi <br />Reservoir and by all of the access roads being made into the drainage <br />areas above. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />XI-431 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.