My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00392
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00392
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:25:47 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:42:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8276.150
Description
Grand Valley Unit-Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
4/1/1992
Title
1991 Annual Report: Grand Valley Salinity Control Project Monitoring and Evaluation Program
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~.p <br />00 <br />M <br />C) <br />Cl <br /> <br />-, <br />-. <br /> <br />b. summary of Field Evaluations <br /> <br />The following is a brief summary of the 1991 monitoring field <br />evaluations: <br /> <br />1. Overuse of water is prevalent throughout the Grand Valley <br />because of abundant supply of inexpensive irrigation water. <br />Most producers are not concerned about irrigation water <br />management (IWM). Very few farmers practice a high degree <br />of IWM. <br /> <br />2. Poor irrigation efficiencies at some sites are due to over <br />irrigation, i.e. fields are irrigated too soon and too <br />long. All of the monitored surface irrigation systems are <br />capable of irrigating at 50% or greater efficiency with <br />proper management. <br /> <br />3. During pre-irrigation of annual crops and first irrigation <br />of perennial crops for stand establishment (e.g. alfalfa), <br />many farmers in the Grand Valley apply a large amount of <br />water to "black over" the soil so that seeds have adequate <br />moisture for germination and establishment. The <br />elimination of this practice would reduce deep percolation <br />substantially (see #5). However, farmer accepted <br />alternative cultural or management practice would be needed <br />to ensure stand establishment. <br /> <br />4. Excess pre-irrigation, or the first irrigation, is the <br />biggest contributor to seasonal deep percolation losses. <br />This is directly related to high infiltration rate during <br />these irrigations, which subsequently decreases after the <br />first irrigation. This is supported by the "advance time" <br />data obtained from some of the monitored sites. When <br />infiltration is high, it takes longer for water to reach <br />the end of the furrow. The "advance time" is less during <br />later irrigations because of the decrease in infiltration <br />rate due to sealing of the soil surface. <br /> <br />5. The 1991 data for surface irrigated monitored sites <br />indicate that, on the average, about 30% of the seasonal <br />deep percolation losses occurred during the first <br />irrigation event and about 45% by the end of second <br />irrigation. For annual crops (small grain and corn), 41% <br />of deep percolation occurred during the first irrigation <br />and about 59% by the completion of the second irrigation. <br /> <br />6. The 1991 data also show that surface irrigated perennial <br />crop sites had slightly more deep percolation than annual <br />crops. Normally, the reverse is true. Deep percolation <br />for perennial crops remained fairly uniform throughout the <br /> <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.