Laserfiche WebLink
<br />SUMMARY <br /> <br />The Regional Director's proposed feasibility report for the Uinta <br />Basin Unit of the Colorado River Water Quality Improvement Program is <br />scheduled for completion in 1982. This status report will inform con- <br />cerned interests of the preliminary, subappraisal level costs and impacts <br />associated with the plan at this time. <br /> <br />The Uinta Basin Unit investigation in northeastern Utah was author- <br />ized by Public Laws 93-320 and 96-375 to determine the most cost-effectivel! <br />way to reduce the salinity in the Colorado River system by reducing the <br />quantity of poor quality water entering the Duchesne and Green Rivers. <br />Irrigation return flows from these rivers flow eventually into the Colorado <br />River carrying over 240,000 tons of salt from the study area. The salt is <br />picked up from both off-farm and on-farm sources and results in an increase <br />in salinity concentrations at Imperial Dam of about 24 milligrams per liter <br />(mg/L). The Soil Conservation Service (SCS) and the Bureau of Reclamation <br />are coordinating individual studies in the total salinity reduction effort. <br /> <br />Some of the irrigation facilities in the Uinta Basin were constructed <br />as early as 1905 with little overall consideration for seepage prevention. <br />Much of the system was cut directly into the saline soils and rock. <br />Conveyance system seepage through the unlined canals results in a loss of <br />water and the aforementioned salt loading. <br /> <br />A public involvement program aided in evaluating a number of alter- <br />natives. In January 1981, the planning team recommended concrete lining as <br />much of the canal and lateral system in the Uinta Basin as can be justified <br />under the salinity reduction objective. In February, meetings were held <br />in Duchesne and Roosevelt to present alternatives based on this recommenda- <br />tion to the public for their information, and to solicit additional ideas or <br />concerns. <br /> <br />The table on the following page shows the two options presently <br />being considered, one using saved water on presently irrigated lands, which <br />is the preference of the local water users, and one not using saved water <br />for irrigation purposes. The cost-effectiveness of each option is shown on <br />both an incremental and a cumulative basis. The figures shown in the table <br />are subappraisal level and may change with refinement of the plan. Additional <br />computer model studies are being conducted which will illustrate the <br />effects of the authorized Central Utah Project units on the salinity <br />control program. <br /> <br />Assuming Congress authorizes construction of the unit in 1985, <br />construction could begin in 1989. Monitoring of system salt loads would <br />continue throughout advance planning and during and after construction to <br />determine effectiveness of the plan. <br /> <br />1/ Cost-effectiveness as it is used in this report is the cost per <br />~ <br />mg/L 1n salt concentration at Imperial Dam. The Bureau of Reclamation is <br /> <br />attempting through its salinity studies to determine which of the units of <br /> <br />the Colorado River Water Quality Improvement Program have the greatest <br /> <br />potential for salt concentration reduction for the least amount of,mong <br />d d /" ,"," . J;8 <br />expen e . l...j ~ti <br />