|
<br />,
<br />
<br />Table 7
<br />Option 2--No use of saved
<br />Candidate Plan 2--Cumulative cost
<br />Evaluat ion
<br />Canal
<br />Pleasant Valley
<br />Pahcease
<br />ZiDDllerman Wash
<br />Grey Mount ain
<br />South Fork Dry Gulch
<br />Purdy-Midview
<br />Henry Jim
<br />Duchesne Feeder
<br />North My ton Bench
<br />My ton Townsite
<br />Whiterocks-East Uinta
<br />Dry Gulch-Riverdale
<br />Ouray School
<br />Bench
<br />Highline
<br />Rock Point
<br />Hancock Cone
<br />Sand Wash
<br />Pelican Lake
<br />Subtotal
<br />Interest during
<br />const ruc t ion
<br />Total
<br />Annual equivalent cost
<br />Operation, maintenance,
<br />and replacement costs
<br />Total annual cost
<br />Reduction in concentration
<br />at Imperial Dam
<br />Cost per mg/L at Imperial Dam
<br />
<br />wildlife Mitigation
<br />
<br />water
<br />effectiveness
<br />Cost
<br />(January 1981.)
<br />$6,195,000
<br />617,000
<br />1,324,000
<br />10 ,276 ,000
<br />4,049,000
<br />2,818,000
<br />1,301,000
<br />388,000
<br />4,566,000
<br />8,971,000
<br />5,285,000
<br />3,872,000
<br />990,000
<br />4,638,000
<br />11,053,000
<br />4,803,000
<br />4,557,000
<br />5,202,000
<br />4,959,000
<br />85,864,000
<br />
<br />3,130,000
<br />88,994,000
<br />6,754,600
<br />
<br />342,400
<br />7,097,000
<br />
<br />9.58
<br />740,800
<br />
<br />A possible wildlife mitigation plan for any of the alternatives
<br />entails acquisition and development of land along the Duchesne River where
<br />development would not aggravate the salinity problem. The plan would
<br />include measures such as creating shallow ponds, perimeter fencing, sign-
<br />ing, parking areas, and some areas of special forage plantings. Deer
<br />escape structures would be included on canals where deer movement was
<br />determined to be a problem. Although a wildlife plan has not been
<br />completed, a Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act report is scheduled for
<br />completion in April of 1982. The Bureau of Reclamation and Fish and
<br />Wildlife Service, estimate mitigation costs would be less than $1,000,000
<br />based on one percent of project costs. The Bureau and Fish and wildlife
<br />Service do not anticipate much environmental damage; and, therefore,
<br />mitigation costs would be slight.
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />21
<br />
<br />-'. I' /.. .... ....
<br />l! '.. t .i i .:..
<br />
|