Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br /> <br />Option <br />Candidate Plan <br />Evaluation <br />Units <br />Pleasant Valley <br />Pahcease <br />Zimmerman Wash <br />Grey Mountain <br />South Fork Dry Gulch <br />Purdy-Mid view <br />Henry Jim <br />Duchesne Feeder <br />North My ton Bench <br />My ton Townsite <br />Whiterocks-East Uinta <br />Subtotal <br />Interest during <br />construction <br />Tot a1 <br />Annual equivalent cost <br />Operation, maintenance, <br />and replacement costs <br />Total annual cost <br />Reduction in concentration <br />at Imperial Dam (mg/L) <br />Cost per mg/L at Imperial <br />1/ Cumulative value <br /> <br />Table 6 <br />2--No Use of Saved Water <br />1--Incremental cost-effectiveness <br />Cost <br />(January 1981) <br />$6,195,000 <br />617 , 000 <br />1,324,000 <br />10,276,000 <br />4,049,000 <br />2,818,000 <br />1,301,000 <br />388,000 <br />4,566,000 <br />8,971,000 <br />5,285,000 <br />45,790,000 <br /> <br />1,688,000 <br />47,478,000 <br />3,603,500 <br /> <br />192,800 <br />3,796,300 <br /> <br />Dam <br />for <br /> <br />7.33 <br />517 90o.!.I <br />, <br />candidate plan. <br /> <br />Candidate Plan No. 2 (Cumulative Analysis) <br /> <br />Under this plan improvements in all 19 of the evaluation units would <br />be made. The total construction costs (including interest) for this plan, <br />as shown in Table 7, would be $88,994,000 and the total annual cost would <br />be $7,097,000. The reduction in salt concentration at Imperial Dam would <br />be 9.58 mg/L per year, with a cost effectiveness of $740,800. <br /> <br />\}-,Cli?l <br /> <br />20 <br />