My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00355
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00355
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:25:34 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:40:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.37.A
Description
Collbran Project
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
2/1/1994
Author
USDOI/BOR
Title
Collbran Project, Colorado. Draft Special Report/IEP Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />SUMMARY <br /> <br />Expand Collbran Project benefits and revenues in harmony with <br />Reclamation's Strategic Plan. <br /> <br />Two action alternatives (A&B) are presented in this report along <br />with a no action alternative. Alternative A would 1) augment the <br />value of power generated by use of peaking operations, 2) reduce <br />annual OM&R expenditures by; limiting regular OM&R as well as <br />discontinuing further extraordinary maintenance work, and 3) <br />contract water supplies to Recovery Implementation Program (RIP) <br />and/or to a M&I water supplier. The interests of the CCD would be <br />fully protected as these actions are implemented. <br /> <br />Alternative B would lease or privatize all power facilities. All <br />operation and maintenance responsibilities including the OM&R of <br />the Grand Mesa reservoirs would be placed with the non-Federal <br />lessee or owner. Lease or sale revenues would repay the Collbran <br />Project debt at a higher interest rate than that which is currently <br />assigned to the interest bearing reimbursable cost allocation or in <br />a lump sum. Current Clinton Administration policies and goals <br />aimed at reducing the Federal deficit and divestiture of small <br />Reclamation projects would be addressed. It is believed that a <br />non-Federal operator could obtain significantly higher power <br />revenues than what the preference customers of the Federal power <br />-- -- -,-~~-------- - -- -- ---- --- -- - -- --- - -~-- -~- -- - - --- ------ - --- <br />are willing to pay. <br /> <br />The no action alternative is not considered as a viable option <br />since it does not address the financial needs of the project nor <br />flow enhancement for the endangered fish species. <br /> <br />Alternative A meets the minimum criteria and addresses each of the <br />goals. Under Alternative A, with the selection of the GJPO <br />Preferred OM&R Program and discontinuance of future extraordinary <br /> <br />-;--.., <br /> <br />Hi <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.