My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00297
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00297
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 7:10:09 AM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:38:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8030
Description
Section D General Correspondence-Other Organizations/Agencies
State
CO
Date
1/1/1971
Author
USWRC
Title
US Water Resources Council-1972-1977-Standing State Advisory Committee to Water Resources Council-A Report of Activities
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />31 <br /> <br />Sunrmary Remarks <br /> <br />PANEL C: To Strengthen the States <br /> <br />S. L. (Jack) Frost - Moderator <br /> <br />O:J~ <br />\oct, <br /> <br />In Perspective <br /> <br />Until the Water Resources Planning Act of 1965, there was little Federal <br />effort to encourage a nationwide program of State water planning. Planning <br />generally was a role of the Federal agencies. Some States, because of <br />early recognition of the need for assessment oI their water resources, devel- <br />oped water planning programs; but generally this State effort nationally waS <br />minimal. <br /> <br />But times have changed, and now the States are starting to move in many <br />directions. As a result, the piecemeal pattern of Federal assistance, which <br />grew during the period of State inactivity, now becomes evident as does the <br />problem of States rising to the tremendous task and opportunity which confronts <br />them. <br /> <br />Where will this path lead? How strong will the environmental influence be in <br />determining this course? Will Federal assistance be reshaped to this new <br />pattern, or will it continue as a bewildering impediment? Will water assume <br />a more dominant role in State bureaucracy? And in turn, how will the States <br />adapt to the local governments, and citizen interest and the need for their <br />involvement. <br /> <br />There is no one answer--but there must be better answers, This was the <br />arena to which the State panel directed itself to set needs in clearer perspec- <br />tive and to probe for possible answers. <br /> <br />Some of the Questions <br /> <br />1. What kind of a Federal-State-Iocal partnership should exist in the <br />water planning effort? <br /> <br />2. What role should the Federal Government play in the partnership? <br /> <br />3. How should State planning be integrated with river basin commis- <br />sion planning? <br /> <br />4. Should the Federal Act spell out how local governments and citizens <br />become involved with the States where Title III funds are used? <br /> <br />5. What is to be the role of the Environmental Protection Agency in <br />the Water Resources Act and with the States'? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.