My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00292
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00292
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:13:36 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:37:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.106
Description
Animas-La Plata
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
6/5/1991
Author
Lois G. Witte - Esq.
Title
Negotiating an Indian Water Rights Settlement: The Colorado Ute Indian Experience
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />of the Interior signed a binding cost-share agreement for the <br />construction of the Animas-La Plata Project. This agreement also <br />included the parameters of the Indian water rights settlement <br />which were, in essence, the Agreement in Principal reached by <br />Colorado. and the Ute Indian Tribes in March. At the time the <br />parties anticipated merely "clarifying" the March Agreement in <br />Principal. <br />The anticipated "clarification" turned into six more months <br />af intense negotiations on almost every issue, with leasing the <br />central issue. Interior had a national agenda far these Indian <br />settlements and the Colorado Ute Settlement did nat fit the mold. <br />Often Colorado and the two Ute Tribes were aligned against the <br />federal trustee. Fortunately, all parties persevered, and on <br />December 10, 1986, the Final Settlement Agreement was signed by <br />the Departments of the Interior and Justice, the State af Cola- <br />rado, the Ute Mountain Ute Indian Tribe, the Southern Ute Indian <br />Tribe, and various water conservancy districts, municipalities, <br />ditch companies, and water users in Colorado. The State of New <br />Mexico did not need to sign this agreement because it did not <br />involve New Mexico cost-sharing or New Mexico water rights. <br /> <br />III. Final Settlement Agreement <br /> <br />The Final Settlement Agreement is a complex and lengthy <br /> <br />-8- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.