Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />\ <br /> <br />, <br />. <br /> <br />." <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />30S0 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />AdjUGtcd annual equivalent benefits anticipated from development <br /> <br />of the NarrOHS Unit total $5.2 mi.llion, of ",hich $5.0 million are <br /> <br />direct benefits. <br /> <br />'rhe estimated construction cost of the Unit, based on January 1969 <br /> <br />prices, is $68 million. Annual operation, maintenance, and replacement <br /> <br />costs' a~e estimated to be $313,000. Annual equivalent Federal costs <br /> <br /> <br />fOr a lOa-year period of analysis at 3-1/4 percent intercst are eomputed <br /> <br />to be $2.75 million. <br /> <br />The ratio of total annual benefits to annual equivalent costs is <br /> <br />. 1. 9 to 1. The ratio of direct benefits to costs is 1. 8to 1. <br /> <br />'The total construction costs ($68 million) have been allocated <br /> <br />to the functions of the Unit: as fo110Hs: irrigation, $21.1 million; <br /> <br />. flood control, $2lf.4 million; recreation, $15.8 million; fish and <br /> <br />wildlife enhancement, $6.6 million; road relocation, $135,000. <br /> <br />Effect of Proposed Develop",?nt on ~uil.lity of the Human Environment <br /> <br />._T_he relationship of the proposed Narro\(TS Unit to the quality of <br /> <br />the human environment has been exami.nec1 ~lith respect to the intent and <br /> <br />purpose of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. The investi- <br /> <br />gation and formulation of the plan for this proposed water and related <br /> <br />land.resourccs development was completed and the Secretary's report <br /> <br />reeomr.ending authorization of the Nar,rows Unit was pending before the <br /> <br />Congress prior to the enactment of the Act. <br /> <br />