My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00146
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00146
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:12:58 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:32:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8275.100
Description
Legislation and Litigation -- SALINITY -- Federal Legislation
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
3/26/1981
Title
Synopsis of Title I of the Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Act
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />The lining of approximately 49 miles of the Coachella Canal <br />~ in California will decrease the amount of water lost through see- <br />~ page but will allow this salvaged water to be temporarily used to <br />C) meet the salinity control objectives of Minute No. 242. ThIs <br />~ temporary use will end when California has less water than <br />allowed under the Boulder Canyon Project Act and the Supreme <br />Court decision in Arizona against California. The amount of water <br />in question is approximatley 132,000 acre-feet per year. The <br />canal was operating in laLe 1980 with only the telemetering <br />towers and wildlife mitigation aspects remaining. <br /> <br />The acreage retirement and irrigatIon efficiency improvement <br />programs are aimed at reducing the irrigation return flows and <br />thus reduce the operating cost of the Yuma DesaltIng Plant. In <br />addition, it would also insure that water use does not exceed the <br />District's annual Colorado River allocation of 300,000 acre- <br />feet. Authorization for the Well ton-Mohawk Project was under the <br />1947 Gila Reauthorization Act which included 75,000 acres for <br />irrigation. However, In 1973, about 20 years after the first <br />delivery of Colorado RIver water, only 64,000 acres were being <br />irrigated. The retirement of 10,000 acres, as proposed in this <br />Act, would not result in land being taken out of production. The <br />irrigation efficiency improvement programs included upgrading <br />some gravity systems, conversion of some areas to pressure <br />systems, and an irrigation management and schedulIng program. <br /> <br />The development of the well field In Arizona is in response <br />to the completion of the San Luis Mesa .Well Field by Mexico in <br />1972. This well field is located immediately south of the inter- <br />national boundary separating Arizona from Sonora, Mexico. The <br />Mexican pumping was withdrawIng water from the United States at <br />an annual average rate of 107,000 acre-feet. The MexIcan pump- <br />ing, along with the Yuma Mesa pumping, was rapidly lowering the <br />water table in this area. The lower water table was causing a <br />significant decrease in flows from the Yuma Main Drain. It was <br />felt that continued pumping by Mexico would eventually eliminate <br />ali drain flows whIch were estimated at approximately 125,000 <br />acre-feet. The United States has an obligation to Mexico of <br />140,000 acre-feet of water at the Southerly International <br />Boundary. The historical difference between 140,000 acre-feet <br />and 125,000 acre-feet was made up of wasteway flows. The pro- <br />posed well field (Protective and Regulatory Pumping Unit Well <br />Field) is limited by Minute No. 242 to 16D,000 acre-feet an- <br />nually. The San Luis Mesa Field is also limIted to this <br />quantity. It is estimated that 125,000 acre-feet of this water <br />would be used to meet the United States' obligation to Mexico and <br />the remaining 35,000 acre-feet will be available for use in the <br />United States. Of the projected 35 wells, 14 have been <br />completed, 7 have been drilled but not outfitted and 14 are still <br />in the planning stage as of March 1981. <br /> <br />The two add i t ional feiltures of T it Ie I that are of relative <br />imporLance are the feasibility study for reject water and the <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.