Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />\ <br /> <br />220 <br /> <br />REPORT OF SECRETARY <br /> <br />protection to the crop against drought. The protection to the <br />crop against droughit is. in . almost exact proportion to. the total <br />available soil water within reach of. the crop." This was found <br />particularly true for the small grains in the drier years. During <br />the 16 years that the Station has been under operation the water <br />stored by summer-tillage has more than doubled the yield of winter <br />wheat as compared with wintel' wheat following small grain. Many <br />years during the 16. only enough, water was accumulated to moisten <br />two or three feet of soiL It is not claimed that water. in storage <br />will completely produce a crop, but it will tend to carry it thru a <br />drought. There' aIje very leV!" years when there is '.not sufficient. <br />rainfall so that with moisture in storage in the soil satisfactory crops <br />al'e. obtained. L. L. Zook, in Nebraska Experiment Station Bul. 192, <br />(8, p. 2.) says: "Average yields per acre of all crops were . higher <br />on . fallow than under any system of contin'uous cropping. Yilelds <br />of grain on failow were frequently mOl'e than double those of grain <br />after grain.. Of crops grown on fallow the largest gains were made <br />by winter wheat and the smallest by corn." <br /> <br />In . Circular No. 72, Kansas State AgricuLtural College (4), <br />George S. Knapp reports: "Experiments at the Garden. City Branch <br />Experiment Station, covering a period. of five years; have shown <br />that sufficient .water 'can be stored in the soil by win~er irrigation <br />alone .to proiluce good crops of com, kafir, milo, .and certain row <br />crops. The soil on which\l;heseexperiments were made is a deep silt, <br />loam, representative of most of the upland in. the western part of the <br />state. Good yields have been obtained each year with all crops <br />grown on the winter irrigated land. At the same time with the <br />exception of the wet ~eason of 1915; unirrigated land produced prae. <br />tically nothing.'~ <br /> <br />Abundant evidence as to the value of water either stored or as <br />a <:lirectapplication, might be presented but it seems hardly necessary <br />. to do it in vie\yof the fact that it is now so generally recognized <br />that water is the limiting factor in crop production in the area. <br />known as the Great Plains. The question now comes' whether or not <br />the soils. of this pal,ticulararea have the ability to hold the water <br />effici~ntlY when it is applied. <br /> <br />.\ <br /> <br />Soils of the Area. <br /> <br />. .. <br /> <br />. . The soil of the proposed irrigation area is .all of loessial ongm. <br />The loess material below the line of soil de\'elopment is' of general <br />uniform composition and texture and extends to a depth of 100 feet or <br />more without any faults such as rock strata, hard pan, or gravtel <br />seams. It lies upon a bed of water bearing' sand, which seems to <br />i mderlie the entire loess plains. Below the sand is the. Pierre Shale <br />of C~etaoeous age. . The only variation thruout the depth of the loess <br /> <br />-.... ~ -. . e-:.; <br />