Laserfiche WebLink
<br />C\l <br />cc <br />1:"", <br /> <br />,...- <br />....... <br /> <br />c <br /> <br />.;..<.... <br />.~t:; <br /> <br />!:NVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEME.~T <br /> <br />Table 5-1 <br />Statistical Comoarison of Alternatives <br />(Jan. '78 AP'Praisal Level Data) <br />2 3 4 5 <br /> <br />Item <br />Municipal and industrial <br />water supply (acre- <br />(feetll! <br />DeDlecion of Colorado <br />River (acre-feet) <br />Pewer produced (MW) <br />Peaking <br />B aseload <br />Pro j ec t feat ure. <br />Reservoirs <br />Dominguez <br />Capacity (acre- <br />feec) <br />Surface area <br />(acres) <br />Length (miles) <br />Dam height <br />(feec) <br />Dike length <br />(feet) <br />Railroad relo- <br />cation (miles) <br />Highway reloca- <br />tion (miles) <br />Multilevel out- <br />lee work <br />Gibbler Gulch <br />(acre-feet> <br />Rim Basin (acre- <br />fact) <br />Municipal and in- <br />dustrial terminal <br />storage reser- <br />voir (acre-feee) <br />Whitewater Recrea- <br />tion Lake (sur- <br />face acres) <br />Pcwerplancs (Mk) <br />!Jominguez <br />Rim Basin <br />Gibbler Gulch <br />Conveyance ays tems and <br />pumping planes <br />(d.l <br />Recreation (sites) <br />Flatwater 2 2 2 <br />Rafting 2 2 2 <br />Benefit-cost ratio3/ 1.0:1 .90:1 1.11:1 <br />1 Later and more detailed stud1es indicated that <br />feet to 21,200 acre-feet. I <br />1/ Cost summaries for nonatructural type alternatives were not developed during 1978 investigation. <br />3/ The 30 miles represents the new railroad alignment; 36 miles of existing track would be relocated. <br />~/ Data for plan 9 were backdated to the 1978 level to be comparable to the other alternatives. <br /> <br />21,800 <br /> <br />21,800 <br /> <br />33,100 <br /> <br />33,100 <br /> <br />1,000 <br />17 <br /> <br />500 <br />17 <br /> <br />302,000 <br /> <br />302,000. <br /> <br />5,080 <br />24 <br /> <br />5,080 <br />24 <br /> <br />171 <br /> <br />171 <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />yes <br /> <br />yes <br /> <br />8,300 <br /> <br />8,300 <br /> <br />43 <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br />1,000 <br /> <br />500 <br /> <br />74 <br /> <br />21,800 <br /> <br />33,100 <br /> <br />500 <br />18 <br /> <br />302,000 <br /> <br />5,080 <br />24 <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />yes <br /> <br />6,453 <br /> <br />43 <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br />74 <br /> <br />ii <br /> <br />21,800 <br /> <br />15,100 <br /> <br />300 <br />15 <br /> <br />45,000 <br /> <br />1,500 <br />14 <br /> <br />171 <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />yes <br /> <br />3,200 <br /> <br />43 <br /> <br />18 <br />500 <br /> <br />15 <br />300 <br /> <br />74 <br /> <br />2 <br />1.05: 1 <br />MfiI water <br /> <br />21,800 <br /> <br />20 ,600 <br /> <br />300 <br />15 <br /> <br />115,700 <br /> <br />2,550 <br />23 <br /> <br />,86 <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />yes <br /> <br />4,200 <br /> <br />43 <br /> <br />74 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />21,800 <br /> <br />60,100 <br /> <br />500 <br />48 <br /> <br />891,600 <br /> <br />10,500 <br />37 <br /> <br />121 <br /> <br />25\ <br /> <br />3,900 <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />yes' <br /> <br />6,453 <br /> <br />43 <br /> <br />43 <br /> <br />15 <br />300 <br /> <br />48 <br />500 <br /> <br />74 <br /> <br />74 <br /> <br />2 <br />2 2 <br />1.06:1 1.05:1 <br />needs should be reduced <br /> <br />SUMMARY <br /> <br />/./7 <br /> <br />~/8 <br /> <br />::!../ 9 <br /> <br />21, SOD <br /> <br />12l,aOO <br /> <br />i,600 <br /> <br />251,900 <br /> <br />36 <br /> <br />700,400 <br /> <br />.:3,':'00 <br />34 <br /> <br />:Z4! <br /> <br />4,130 <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />yes <br /> <br />43 <br /> <br />43 <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />36 <br /> <br />74 <br /> <br />74 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />2 <br />2 <br />1.1\: \ <br />21,800 acre- <br /> <br />1 <br />3 <br /> <br />from <br />