My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00029
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00029
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:12:26 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:29:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8271.300
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - General Information and Publications-Reports
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
6/1/1976
Title
Computer Simulation of Surface Water Hydrology and Salinity with and Application to Studies of Colorado River Management -- Part 2 of 2 -- Page 143 - end
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />r::) <br />Cl <br />f\:) <br />t-' <br />W <br />N <br /> <br />201 <br /> <br />uncertain. This uncertainty is important in that its presence in- <br /> <br />creases the risks inherent in making management decisions. <br /> <br />The following questions may be posed: (1) how much of the ob- <br /> <br />served variation in response is the result of properties of the hydro- <br /> <br />logic processes modeled, and how much is the result of a failure to <br /> <br />model all relevant streamflow characteristics; (2) can the uncertainty <br /> <br />in response be lessened through refinement of the model; and (3) given <br /> <br />the uncertainty in response, how should the output of the model be <br /> <br />interpreted and used in making management decisions? <br /> <br />The first and second questions concern the validity of the model <br /> <br />and are discussed in this section. The third question involves model <br /> <br />application and is addressed in Chapter 7. <br /> <br />The limited data base used for calibration introduces an inherent <br /> <br />uncertainty into the values of all quantities examined with the model. <br /> <br />This uncertainty can be decreased by reca1ibrating the existing model <br /> <br />as more data become available. However, there are streamflow charac- <br /> <br />teristics that are not necessarily reproduced by the, synthetic stream- <br /> <br />flow generator used in the model. One suggestion for improving the <br /> <br />streamflow generator is presented here. <br /> <br />An examination of the ten simulations performed with the model <br /> <br />indicated that the variation in frequency of reservoir failure was <br /> <br />related to the differences in patterns of years of high and low runoff. <br /> <br />This observation suggests that information about naturally occurring <br /> <br />patterns of high and low runoff might indicate modifications to the <br /> <br />model that would provide more accurate determination of system response. <br /> <br />For example, analyses of run-length (duration) and run-sum (severity) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.