Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />e <br /> <br />N <br />". <br /> <br />Major <br />Activity <br />Numbe r <br /> <br />V, A2 <br /> <br />v, A3 <br /> <br />V, 81 <br /> <br />'Y, 82 <br /> <br />Gene~a\ Procedure <br />and Data Source <br /> <br />Technical consultation. <br />Phases II. ! II. I V <br />and V. <br /> <br />Reconsideration. <br />Phase VAl, Al. <br />Interagency Work Gp. <br /> <br />Prepare final <br />recommended plan. <br />Phase V AI, A2, A3 <br /> <br />Analyze final <br />recommended plan. <br />PhaseV,BI. ' <br /> <br />Prepare Basin report. <br />Phases I, II, II I.IV & <br />V, Interagency WG. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />g. <br />f,:>' <br />N <br />". <br />&:r <br />f""';- <br /> <br />USDA DETAILED WORK OUTLINE <br />RIO GI\ANDE TYPE it COOPERATIVE STU~Y <br />Apr i I 1975 <br /> <br />Specific Procedures <br />Assist public in interpreting the alternative plans. <br />Provide backup materlal. <br /> <br />Review and reconsider, if necessary. components of <br />objectives and formulate revised Of additional <br />plans. Reaction from Ad Hoc Committee will be re- <br />viewed in Interagency Work Group meetings. <br /> <br />Cumulate the plan formulation process by choosing <br />a plan from all the alternatives which best satis- <br />fies the priorities and preferences expressed by <br />the public at all levels, which will be affected <br />by the plan. Any of the alternatives developed <br />and screened th~ough the procedures above could <br />be s~lected on its own merits because of its <br />effectiveness in contributing to a given mix of <br />component needs. A recommended plan must have <br />net positive NED benefits occur in order to serve <br />environmental qual ity. The net deficit in NED <br />benefits cannot exceed NED benefits foregone for" <br />environmental quality as detailed in IV 3. Analyze <br />recommended plan to determine USDA developmental <br />and resource use programs which exist or are needed <br />to implement the plan. <br /> <br />Run lP to analyze the final recommended plan and <br />tabulate effects by the multi-objective account <br />system. <br /> <br />Publish the final Basin report. Some sections <br />will be d"rafted earlier in the study. <br /> <br />:Purpose <br /> <br />StiltuS/ <br />Man-Days _ <br />SCS: F$: i:P,5 <br /> <br />: Who <br /> <br />:Start <br /> <br />':no <br /> <br />Plan formulation <br /> <br />4176 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />';177 <br /> <br />Staff <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />Plan formulat ion Staff <br /> <br />4176 <br /> <br />(i/77 <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />5 5 <br /> <br />Formulation of <br />final recommen- <br />ded plan. <br /> <br />4/76 <br /> <br />10 10 <br /> <br />Staff <br /> <br />f/77 <br /> <br />70 <br /> <br /> " <br />Formulation of Palmer 4/76 6/77 70 20 40 <br />final reconTl1en- Glasgow <br />ded plan. <br />Final Basin Staff 6/77 10177 500 10 50 <br />report. <br />