My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC07634
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
20000-20849
>
WSPC07634
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:11:57 PM
Creation date
10/9/2006 6:34:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8507
Description
River Basin General Publications
State
CO
Basin
Rio Grande
Water Division
3
Date
4/18/1975
Title
USDA Detailed Work Outline - Rio Grande Type 4 Cooperative Study
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br />w <br /> <br />Major <br />i-\ctillity <br />rlUr.1ber <br /> <br />IV A, B, C <br />" <br />(contd) <br /> <br />V, AI <br /> <br />General Procedure <br />and Oa ta Source <br /> <br />Analyze NED and EQ <br />emphasis plans. <br />Phase IV. <br /> <br />Select initial <br />recommended plan. <br />Phase IV, Inter. <br />agency Work Group. <br /> <br />Analyze initial <br />recommended plan. <br />Phase IV, V AI.' <br /> <br />Present NED, EQ and <br />initial recommended <br />plan. <br />Phase IV 4, V A, <br />Interagency Work <br />Group. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />USDA DETAILED WORK OUTLINE <br />RIO GRANDE TYPE 4 COOPERATIVE STUDY <br />Ape; I 1975 <br /> <br />Specific Procedures <br /> <br />Run lP to analyze the NED and EQ emphasis plans. Pro- <br />Programs se\ected for inclusion in each plan are <br />plugged into the LP as coefficients. These lP coeffi- <br />cients were derived in Phase I II 3 and III 4. Plans <br />are analyzed,_ first with OBERS restraints and second <br />without righthand side restraints (i.e., 0). "Tabu- <br />late these solutions by the multi-objective account <br />system. Evaluate and display beneficial and adverse' <br />effects on components of the objectives. Analyze <br />the differences among the NEO and EQ plans to show <br />trade-offs among the specified components of the <br />objectives. The without development situation <br />is also referenced. Also. analyze the relative value <br />of those beneficial "and adverse effects which are <br />essentially pre~ented in ~onmonetary terms. <br /> <br />SCS, FOREST SERVICE, and ERS Will, from the analysis <br />of the NED and EQ emphasiS plans in Phase IV, select <br />an initial recommended plan which will incorporate <br />features of both the NED and EQ plans. Analyze the <br />effects on components of the multi-objectives. <br /> <br />Run lP to analyze the initia\ recommended p~an and <br />tabulate effects by the multi~objective account <br />system. Phase IV 4 is essentially repeated. <br /> <br />Present NED. EQ and initial recommended plans to <br />Ad Hoc Committee. Include evaluation and display <br />of each plan as developed in Phase IV 4 and V A. <br />Publish preliminary findings. <br /> <br />:Purpose <br /> <br />Plan formula- <br />tion. <br /> <br />Plan formula- <br />tion. <br /> <br />Plan formula- <br />tion. <br /> <br />Plan formula- <br />tion. <br /> <br />:Who <br /> <br />Palmer <br />Glasgow <br /> <br />Staff <br /> <br />Palmer <br />Glasgow <br /> <br />Staff <br /> <br />:5tart <br />4176 <br /> <br />4176 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />End <br />6/77 <br /> <br />1/77 <br /> <br />q <br />o <br />r..:> <br />.."'" <br />r:.,~ <br />r-' <br /> <br /> <br />Status/ <br />Man-Davs <br />SCS: FS: E?J <br />100 SO 100 <br /> <br />6" <br /> <br />20 15 <br /> <br />80 <br /> <br />20 15 <br /> <br />120 <br /> <br />2" 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.