Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,. <br /> <br />001987 <br /> <br />\^lEST SIOPE RESERVOIR CONCEPT STUDIED <br /> <br />Page. . . . . . . . . . a . . . . .2 <br /> <br />1l/2B/71 DENVER POST <br />BY Dick Prouty <br /> <br />From the reservoir at ;':Olcott. the water then could J:e pumped about 17., miles <br />to Piney lake, \oimch \olould becorr.e a reservoir under the water cepartment plan. <br />Tins v;ould require a lift of about 1,BOO feet. <br /> <br />EAGLE-PINEY SYSTE. <br /> <br />From Piney lake reservoir the ragle-Piney collection system would put the <br />\'later on its way to Denver. <br /> <br />If any \\uter is available in t'1e Colorado River, it could be picked up at <br />a facility at State Bridge, plUTped over the'divide and into Alkalai Creek \olhere <br />the Eagle-Colorado reservoir Kould be. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />"\';e have the sarre concern about drying up streams as the people on the <br />\'lestern Slope" said Jarr.es Cgilvie, Denver l';ater Departrr.ent l1'anager. "l';e can't <br />countenance that cmd \,7i.ll \\'Ork l'lith others to get satisfactory levels of rensin- <br />flows that \o;on' t affect fish and other environrr.ental values." <br /> <br />"\':e fully recognize the rights of dmJllstream interests," he said, I'\.Te'll <br />be skimning off tl:e peak flows, not .taking all the \\'8.ter out of the streams." <br /> <br />"l':e're considering the things conservationists are telling us \.7i.tr.out <br />sacrificing the I'later vie need, have filed uFon and expect to acquire," Ogilvie <br />said. <br /> <br />COST SHARIKG <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />"But the additonal costs are going to have to be >;licked up by someone," he <br />said, observing it isn't fair for Denver vlater users to have to pay the entire <br />cost. <br /> <br />OgHvie said the Eagle-Colorado proposal isn't an, alternative to Eagle- <br />Piney. It \\'Ould pennit Il'aximum flexibil,ity in lll3l1aging water to the benefit of <br />both East Slope .and l:est Slope interest, he said. <br /> <br />Glen G. Saunders, Denver water la\oJ}'er and consultant to the board, said <br />the concept offers a real challenge "if environrr.entalists \oJaIlt to take the <br />initiative, they can turn this into sorr.ething to really ber.efit the environment." <br /> <br />"t'le are living (in the Denver area) in an uninhabitwle area. I':'e changed <br />the ecology to get what \\"e have here, to irrprove our environment. <br /> <br />1ID\)I'I'IONl\L COSTS <br /> <br />"It'll cost extra to take the water out below (Vail), so let those \'mo <br />reap the benefits of it pay for it rather Ulan the !,-eople of Denver," Saunders <br />said, noting "vie can' t realistically say we have all the water we need." <br /> <br />And, Saunder::: a!'lJ<ed, "If Denver doesn't do it (water mmagerr.ent) , who's <br />going to do it?" <br /> <br />~, <br />