Laserfiche WebLink
<br />;\ ;) ,14 3 3 <br /> <br />..._.a:..,.Ll:I'Y '""'VA:... <br /> <br />SUBJECT TO REVISION <br /> <br />in 1990 would be limited to 80 percent of that which would have been used in the <br />voluntary conservation case; and the quantity in 2000 and beyond to 2020 would be <br />limited to 70 percent of that quantity which would have been used during the period <br />2000 to 2020 in the voluntary conservation case. The projected results of this limitation <br />of annual water supply to the agricultural sectors in 2020 is presented as a comparison <br />to the Baseline .Case below. <br /> <br />1. Agricultural production: <br />Generally decreased (7.9 percent reduced value) because of limitations on <br />water use. Regional wheat production remains relatively stable compared <br />to the Baseline Case, while corn, cotton and soybean production is projected <br />to decline; <br />Total value of production is lower, but proportionately less than regional <br />crop production because the reduction in agricultural production in the <br />High Plains forees national crop prices to increase; <br />Total returns to land, water, and management for the Region are reduced <br />(7.3 pereent) relative to Baseline Case projections, but not quite as much <br />as decreases in total value of production. <br /> <br />~:; <br /> <br />2. Remaining ground water supplies and irrigated acreage: <br />. The quantity of water remaining in storage in 2020 is 123.7 million <br />acre-feet (5.3 percent) greater than in the Baseline Case; <br />Relatively little change in irrigated acreage would be expected during the <br />Study period; in the early years, irrigated lands are less than in the <br />Baseline Case, but by 2020, lands under irrigation would be 0.6 percent <br />greater than in the Baseline Case. <br /> <br />3. Regional economy: <br />Total projected value added for the Region in 2020 is 2.1 percent below <br />Baseline Case projections-4.0 percent in the North, and 1.0 percent in <br />the South. <br /> <br />Voluntary Conservation of Ollallala Water Combined With Imported Water <br /> <br />Whereas in the previously described cases the SOUl'Ce of water available for use <br />is the Ogallala aquifer, in this case, analyses are made of a case in which the Ogallala <br />aquifer would be supplemented with imported water in sufficient quantities to maintain <br />irrigated acreage at the levels observed in 1977. The study methods and data are the <br />same as those described earlier, with the exception that the water supply available <br />for use in each subarea is adequate to sustain irrigated acreage at the 1977 levels; <br />however, no charge has been included for the cost of imported water. Thus, the <br />resulting income estimates are a measure of the returns to imported water. The <br />results are presented for the year 2020 in the form of comparisons with the projected <br />results of the Baseline Case. <br /> <br />1. Agricultural production: <br />Significant increase (14.8 percent) in value of crop production, since water <br />would be available for all acreages irrigated in 1977; <br />Wheat, the principal dryland crop, would decline by 7.5 percent with the <br />availability of imported water for producing higher-valued crops; <br /> <br />-7- <br />