Laserfiche WebLink
<br />O[}15S9 <br /> <br />CHAPTER 4 <br /> <br />TABLE 4-12 <br />OHV DESIGNATION <br />(Resource Enhancement) <br /> <br />Designation <br /> <br />Acres <br /> <br />Percent <br /> <br />Open <br />Limited <br />Closed <br />TOTAL <br /> <br />102,828 <br />377,745 <br />40,094 <br />520,677 <br /> <br />20 <br />72 <br />8 <br />100 <br /> <br />An NSO and no disposal of mineral materials on Blanca <br />and the Rio Grande River Corridor SRMAs (which includes <br />1,760 acres of wild and scenic proposal) and a portion of <br />SPNM would protect 31,136 acres from surface-disturbing <br />activities. Mineral withdrawals on Blanca and the Rio <br />Grande River Corridor SRMAs would protect 12,145 acres <br />from mineral entry. <br /> <br />A nondiscretionary closure on the WSAs recommended for <br />wilderness designation would protect 3,300 acres of <br />wilderness values from mineral activity. <br /> <br />Protection and enhancement of 3,081 acres of riparian wnes <br />would benefit recreationists seeking scenic and educational <br />opportunities in these unique environments. <br /> <br />A more intensive level of management on Blanca and Trickle <br />Mountain WHAs, and seasonal restrictions or closures in <br />crucial winter ranges, birthing areas, and aquatic habitat <br />would improve and enhance opportunities for hunting, <br />fIShing, and wildlife observation. <br /> <br />Prohibiting forest product harvesting on 23,299 acres of <br />SPNM areas would protect recreation opportunities in scenic <br />and predominantly natural settings. <br /> <br />Acquisition of land adjacent to the Rio Grande River <br />Corridor SRMA through exchange procedures would <br />provide additional public access and reduce conflicts between <br />recreationists and private landowners. Additional land and <br />access would provide increased recreational opportunities. <br /> <br />Management of I 0 ACECs would enhance the nonmotorized <br />types of recreation values (hiking, backpacking) present on <br />17,370 acres of SPNM areas, but would limit OHV <br />dependent use in these areas. Recreation opportunities would <br />be increased and enhanced on the remaining acres. A <br />primitive and wilderness type experience would be available <br />on 1,760 acres of the Rio Grande River Corridor if that <br />segment is designated as wild and scenic by Congress. <br /> <br />Limiting OHV use on 146,370 acres in VRM Class II areas <br />would help protect scenic values. <br /> <br />Closure of 19 cultural sites to OHV use would provide <br />additional protection for cultural values. This closure includes <br />the Cattleguard Folsom site (3,595 acres), which is the only <br />location in the planning area that provides an OHV dune <br />riding recreational opportunity. <br /> <br />Special plant and animal species habitat limited for OHV <br />use would restrict use on 311 acres. <br /> <br />Significant recreational opportunities would be enhanced <br />on Blanca and the Rio Grande River Corridor SRMAs. <br />Protection of semiprimitive recreation values on 23,299 acres <br />would also occur. Dispersed recreational opportunities in <br />the San Luis Extensive Recreation Management Area would <br />be greatly enhanced and increased in this alternative. <br /> <br />Visual Resource Management <br /> <br />t. <br />" <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Under this alternative, proposed surface-disturbing activities <br />must meet the allowable class objectives in class 11, III, <br />and IV areas. <br /> <br />A restoration project, designed to correct and improve the <br />visually contrasting class IV Blanca Chaining area to VRM <br />Class III objectives, would be implemented on 2,375 acres <br />during the life of the plan. Over the long term, the chaining <br />area would be improved to class II. Refer to Appendix <br />F for more details. <br /> <br />Strict conformance to VRM class objectives would protect <br />visual resources. Controlled light cutting on VRM Class <br />II lands would protect the visual qualities of these areas. <br />VRM class objectives would be protected and/or maintained <br />through proper design of rights-of-way proposals. Manage- <br />ment of 10 areas of critical environmental concern would <br />protect the scenic values on 17,690 acres of VRM Class <br />II land and 119,294 acres of VRM Class III land. <br /> <br />Designated OHV use in this alternative would generally <br />maintain or enhance scenic values. Visual resources on <br />146,370 acres of VRM Class II land and 23,299 acres of <br />semiprimitive nonmotorized area (32 percent of the total) <br />would be protected by OHV closures and limitations. Scenic <br />quality would be altered on 102,828 acres (21 percent) <br />of the planning area that is open to OHV use, and the <br />potential for irreversible adverse impacts would increase. <br /> <br />Management of 28 percent of the planning area (146,370 <br />acres) as VRM Class II would protect outstanding scenic <br />visual resources. These lands include the areas of scenery <br />that provide significant recreation opportunities. Manage- <br />ment of the remainder of the area (374,307 acres) as VRM <br />Class III or VRM Class IV would maintain the overall <br />visual character of the planning area, but would allow for <br />visually contrasting projects or disturbances within scattered <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />r <br />I ~ <br /> <br />4-20 <br />