Laserfiche WebLink
<br />001598 <br /> <br />All aquatic habitat would improve under management <br />emphasizing habitat quality and protection, and the net <br />impact would be beneficiaL <br /> <br />Forest and Woodland Management <br /> <br />Managing 1,094 acres (19 percent) of commercial forest <br />lands for sustained yield would permit an annual harvest <br />of 55 Mbf of timber. Woodland management on 6,982 <br />acres (56 percent) of the productive operable woodlands <br />would result in annual harvests of 370 cords of fuelwood. <br /> <br />Eliminating harvests on 1,910 acres of commercial forest <br />land (CFL) located on crucial winter range in the Trickle <br />Mountain area would reduce annual timber production by <br />95Mbf. <br /> <br />Special harvesting techniques necessary to maintain values <br />in 10 ACECs would increase production costs on 1,940 <br />acres of CFL and 1,190 acres of productive operable <br />woodlands. <br /> <br />Eliminating harvest on I, I 10 acres of productive operable <br />woodlands on areas classified as semiprimitive nonmotorized <br />would reduce annual fuelwood production by 59 cords. <br /> <br />Protecting scenic qualities in VRM Class II acres would <br />require special harvesting techniques on 1,660 acres of CFL <br />and 7,685 acres of productive operable woodlands. Final <br />harvest levels would not be reduced, but production costs <br />would be increased because less volume could be removed <br />at anyone harvest entry. <br /> <br />Eliminating harvests on 740 acres of potential wildlife habitat <br />would reduce harvest levels by 37 Mbf (13 percent). <br /> <br />Timber management limitations to meet wildlife. recreation, <br />and VRM objectives would eliminate sustained-yield <br />production on 4,675 acres (80 percent) of CFL resulting <br />in an annual loss of 233 Mbf of timber. These limitations <br />would also preclude annual harvests on 5,500 acres (44 <br />percent) of productive operable woodlands resulting in an <br />annual loss of 290 cords of fuelwood. Forested lands, not <br />included in the allowable harvest base acreage, would grow <br />through successional vegetation stages as influenced by the <br />lack of fire, in most cases, and little or no control of forest <br />pests. <br /> <br />Lands and Realty Management <br /> <br />Emphasis would be given to acquisition of lands with <br />significance for special plant and animal species, paleon- <br />tological, historical and archeological values, riparian areas, <br />wildlife habitat, and recreation areas (especially along the <br /> <br />4-19 <br /> <br />ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES <br /> <br />Rio Grande River). Acquisition efforts could provide <br />secondary benefits for forest and woodlands managemen~ <br />livestock managemen~ and minerals management. <br /> <br />Lands with riparian wnes, wildlife habitat, and recreation <br />areas would continue to be administered by BLM unless, <br />through exchange, the benefits received would equal the <br />benefits exchanged. Disposal of suitable isolated tracts would <br />improve manageability. Exchange of these tracts, however, <br />is preferred when acquisition of desired resources and <br />consolidation of BLM lands would result. <br /> <br />AU withdrawals for protection of wildlife habitat and <br />recreation areas would be retained. All six cultural sites, <br />which are either NRHP or eligible for NRHP would be <br />withdrawn. Potential disruptive activities created by mining <br />activities and other nondiscretionary actions would not <br />occur. Powersite withdrawals would be retained pending <br />the outcome of a formal withdrawal review with the <br />exception of the waterpower site withdrawal on the Rio <br />Grande River Corridor, which would be terminated. <br /> <br />Full protection or mitigation of impacts caused by rights- <br />of-way proposals would be provided for the following <br />resources: special plants and animals, paleontological, <br />historical, archaeological, riparian wnes, visual, and wildlife <br />habitat. AU other ROWs must be compatible with the <br />recreation opportunity spectrum (ROS) guidelines. <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Areas of Special Concern <br /> <br />Resource values on about 138,605 acres (100 percent) would <br />be given special attention to ensure they are not irreparably <br />damaged by any resource use. <br /> <br />Recreation Management <br /> <br />Intensive ~eation management of the Rio Grande River <br />Corridor SRMA (6,016 acres), which includes 1,760 acres <br />of wild and scenic proposal, and Blanca SRMA (7,750 acres) <br />would enhance recreation opportunities on 13,766 acres (3 <br />percent). Extensive recreation management would maintain <br />recreation opportunities on the remaining 506,911 acres (97 <br />percent). Management of Segments A and B of the Rio <br />Grande River Corridor (see Appendix E) as an SRMA would <br />enhance recreation values on 4,256 acres. Management of <br />Segment C of the Rio Grande River Corridor (Appendix <br />E) as a wild and scenic river would enhance the primitive <br />or wilderness type of experience and would protect wildlife <br />on 1,760 acres. <br /> <br />Table 4-12 shows OHV designated acreages. <br /> <br />, <br />I; <br />" <br />I, <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />