<br />001598
<br />
<br />All aquatic habitat would improve under management
<br />emphasizing habitat quality and protection, and the net
<br />impact would be beneficiaL
<br />
<br />Forest and Woodland Management
<br />
<br />Managing 1,094 acres (19 percent) of commercial forest
<br />lands for sustained yield would permit an annual harvest
<br />of 55 Mbf of timber. Woodland management on 6,982
<br />acres (56 percent) of the productive operable woodlands
<br />would result in annual harvests of 370 cords of fuelwood.
<br />
<br />Eliminating harvests on 1,910 acres of commercial forest
<br />land (CFL) located on crucial winter range in the Trickle
<br />Mountain area would reduce annual timber production by
<br />95Mbf.
<br />
<br />Special harvesting techniques necessary to maintain values
<br />in 10 ACECs would increase production costs on 1,940
<br />acres of CFL and 1,190 acres of productive operable
<br />woodlands.
<br />
<br />Eliminating harvest on I, I 10 acres of productive operable
<br />woodlands on areas classified as semiprimitive nonmotorized
<br />would reduce annual fuelwood production by 59 cords.
<br />
<br />Protecting scenic qualities in VRM Class II acres would
<br />require special harvesting techniques on 1,660 acres of CFL
<br />and 7,685 acres of productive operable woodlands. Final
<br />harvest levels would not be reduced, but production costs
<br />would be increased because less volume could be removed
<br />at anyone harvest entry.
<br />
<br />Eliminating harvests on 740 acres of potential wildlife habitat
<br />would reduce harvest levels by 37 Mbf (13 percent).
<br />
<br />Timber management limitations to meet wildlife. recreation,
<br />and VRM objectives would eliminate sustained-yield
<br />production on 4,675 acres (80 percent) of CFL resulting
<br />in an annual loss of 233 Mbf of timber. These limitations
<br />would also preclude annual harvests on 5,500 acres (44
<br />percent) of productive operable woodlands resulting in an
<br />annual loss of 290 cords of fuelwood. Forested lands, not
<br />included in the allowable harvest base acreage, would grow
<br />through successional vegetation stages as influenced by the
<br />lack of fire, in most cases, and little or no control of forest
<br />pests.
<br />
<br />Lands and Realty Management
<br />
<br />Emphasis would be given to acquisition of lands with
<br />significance for special plant and animal species, paleon-
<br />tological, historical and archeological values, riparian areas,
<br />wildlife habitat, and recreation areas (especially along the
<br />
<br />4-19
<br />
<br />ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES
<br />
<br />Rio Grande River). Acquisition efforts could provide
<br />secondary benefits for forest and woodlands managemen~
<br />livestock managemen~ and minerals management.
<br />
<br />Lands with riparian wnes, wildlife habitat, and recreation
<br />areas would continue to be administered by BLM unless,
<br />through exchange, the benefits received would equal the
<br />benefits exchanged. Disposal of suitable isolated tracts would
<br />improve manageability. Exchange of these tracts, however,
<br />is preferred when acquisition of desired resources and
<br />consolidation of BLM lands would result.
<br />
<br />AU withdrawals for protection of wildlife habitat and
<br />recreation areas would be retained. All six cultural sites,
<br />which are either NRHP or eligible for NRHP would be
<br />withdrawn. Potential disruptive activities created by mining
<br />activities and other nondiscretionary actions would not
<br />occur. Powersite withdrawals would be retained pending
<br />the outcome of a formal withdrawal review with the
<br />exception of the waterpower site withdrawal on the Rio
<br />Grande River Corridor, which would be terminated.
<br />
<br />Full protection or mitigation of impacts caused by rights-
<br />of-way proposals would be provided for the following
<br />resources: special plants and animals, paleontological,
<br />historical, archaeological, riparian wnes, visual, and wildlife
<br />habitat. AU other ROWs must be compatible with the
<br />recreation opportunity spectrum (ROS) guidelines.
<br />
<br />J
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />Areas of Special Concern
<br />
<br />Resource values on about 138,605 acres (100 percent) would
<br />be given special attention to ensure they are not irreparably
<br />damaged by any resource use.
<br />
<br />Recreation Management
<br />
<br />Intensive ~eation management of the Rio Grande River
<br />Corridor SRMA (6,016 acres), which includes 1,760 acres
<br />of wild and scenic proposal, and Blanca SRMA (7,750 acres)
<br />would enhance recreation opportunities on 13,766 acres (3
<br />percent). Extensive recreation management would maintain
<br />recreation opportunities on the remaining 506,911 acres (97
<br />percent). Management of Segments A and B of the Rio
<br />Grande River Corridor (see Appendix E) as an SRMA would
<br />enhance recreation values on 4,256 acres. Management of
<br />Segment C of the Rio Grande River Corridor (Appendix
<br />E) as a wild and scenic river would enhance the primitive
<br />or wilderness type of experience and would protect wildlife
<br />on 1,760 acres.
<br />
<br />Table 4-12 shows OHV designated acreages.
<br />
<br />,
<br />I;
<br />"
<br />I,
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
|