Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I. <br /> <br />all absolute water rights \ssociated with the structures explicitly being modeled (as taken from the <br />river node file generated I)r makenet), and 3) a line for all absolute water rights associated with <br />the structures not explicitly\ being modeled but with valid GIS irrigated acreage. The net absolute <br />values will be taken from a database table used in Year 2 to produce the current status (water <br />\ <br />rights tabulation) reports and\will therefore not be calculated on the fly by watright. QNQC of <br />the net absolute values will therefore be done on the values in the database. The graph will be <br />used in Task 2.04 to determine\Jogical break-points for water rights aggregation. <br /> <br />Approach: \ <br /> <br />I. Update the watright utility to have a command-line option (e.g., -wrplot) that would <br />be used to produce the plot file. This would involve sorting by admin number all the <br />water rights retrieved for a\pasin and then creating a plot file for only the net absolute <br />water rights. The capability\to retrieve and sort water rights currently exists in a <br />number ofwatright options (~~alpha, -sort) and new features would be specific to <br />creating the plot file. The list Of structures would be generated from the current <br />basin= and wd= options for wa 'ght with all structures being considered (even those <br />without valid GIS irrigated acrea e). <br />2. Similar to subtask 1, add to the w tright utility the ability to process and plot only the <br />net absolute water rights for struct es that are in an existing river node file produced <br />by makenet (regardless of whether S acreage is available for those structures). <br />Makenet is referred to here because i roduced a river node file that has the structure <br />identifiers in the comment field of the 'ver network file. This is necessary so that <br />watright can determine the structure typ and therefore retrieve water rights <br />information. The line represents roughly :75% of the water use in the basin and will be <br />added to the graph produced in the first s task. (Note that we discussed on the <br />phone that this would be a good utility for ay Bennett to work on. Because we have <br />decided to depend on a "current status" tabl in the database, it would not be difficult <br />for watright to get the list of diversion station from the .dds file and get the water <br />rights from the "current status" file. However, any hand edits on the .ddr file [or <br />differences to changes in the data after the file ~s generated] would not agree with <br />the values from the database]. Either way, this is\a simple task so it is left in for now. <br />Ross: I can go either way.) <br />3. Similar to subtask 1, add to the watright utility the a ility to process and plot only the <br />net absolute water rights for structures that are not in an existing river node file <br />produced by makenet but do have valid GIS irrigated 11 reage. The resulting line <br />represents rougWy 25% of the water use in the basin. . s line will by used by <br />modelers to determine the aggregate water right classes. Because this line will span <br />rougWy 25% of the graph in the y-axis, it may be difficult 0 read. Therefore, the <br />watright utility will allow any of the three lines to be platte independently to make <br />visual review easier. <br />4. Update the watright utility to produce a current status report imilar to that produced <br />in Year 2 except that only net absolute water rights for struct es that are plotted. <br />The purpose of this report will be to supply a report format out ut corresponding to <br />the graphs. This would be used for verification and documentat n and in cases where <br /> <br /> <br />0066 <br /> <br />3 <br />