My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC07384
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
19000-19999
>
WSPC07384
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:10:44 PM
Creation date
10/9/2006 6:26:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8283.200
Description
Colorado River - Colorado River Computer Models - CRDSS
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
4/13/1995
Author
Various
Title
Decision Support Systems - South Platte Basin - SAMSON - Joint Resolution 94-32 - Integrating Hydrologic Models-GIS-Databases - San Diego County Emergency Storage Project - Various Reports
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> - <br />.' <br /> OOllOo4 <br />.' South Platte Decision Support, 8 <br /> currently set up to run on UNIX work stations in Greeley and Denver, and offers limited access to <br /> PC's via modem. <br /> CROSS is now in its second year of development. Many of the database design, population, and <br /> access decisions that have been made during the first year could be duplicated for a South Platte <br /> DSS. The consumptive use models and water resource planning models within CROSS are being <br /> designed for a modular system. The consumptive use model should, therefore, require only slight <br /> modifications to be used in a South Platte DSS. The water resource planning model for the South <br /> Platte must include surface/groundwater interaction; the CROSS planning model would need to be <br /> modified (or replaced with SAMSON?). <br /> Three major hurdles remain, then: <br /> l. Final development and calibration of a basin-wide, surface/groundwater model, <br /> 2. Development and calibration of an appropriate water quality model, and <br /> 3. Development of the database to support the models. <br /> In order to populate the database for a South Platte DSS, routines similar to those used by . <br /> Fredericks in his dissertation will have to be developed. These routines will read infonnation from <br /> an existing database, perfonn any necessary conversions, and write the infonnation to the South <br /> Platte database. Population of this database is arguably the most critical step in DSS development; <br /> indeed, it has been the Achilles' heel of several modeling efforts. Table I lists some of the data <br /> requirements, and possible sources. <br /> Table l. Data Requirements for South Platte DSS <br /> DATA SOURCES <br /> Streamflow USGS Gage Records, SEO, SPWRMS <br /> Aquifer Properties USGS - Hurr/Schneider <br /> Climate NWS, NCWCD, SCS Snotel <br /> Water Rights SEO, SPWRMS <br /> Historic Water Use SEO <br /> Spatial Topology SPWRMS <br /> Operating Rules Reservoir Owners, Ditch Co.'s, Conservancy Districts, ???? <br /> Crop Data SCS, Ditch Co.'s, Conservancy Districts, Remote Sensing? <br /> Soil Types SCS <br /> Water Quality Data Metro WW, Denver Water, USGS, DPHE, DOW <br /> 04/I 1/95 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.