Laserfiche WebLink
<br />0000'03 <br /> <br />South Platte Decision Support, 7 <br /> <br />Implementation Plan for DSS <br /> <br />Colorado's two most recent efforts toward water resource modeling, CROSS and SPWRMS, could <br />both be utilized in the effort to implement a DSS for the South Platte. <br /> <br />In the past, water resources computer models have often been written to address one specific <br /> <br /> <br />problem or environment. Much of the information about a particular river basin, for instance, would <br /> <br /> <br />be included in the model's code. Recent DSS designs have used a "data-centered" approach, where <br /> <br /> <br />one or more databases contain all the information necessary to model a physical situation. <br /> <br />The advantage to this approach is that multiple generic models, each of which serves a different <br /> <br /> <br />purpose, may be configured to access the same central database. The models themselves do not <br /> <br /> <br />contain llm( situation-specific information in their coding; they read all relevant information from <br /> <br /> <br />the database. The major disadvantages of the data-centered approach have been model run times '> <br /> <br /> <br />and start-up costs. <br /> <br />CROSS is being developed with a modular, data-centered desig'ILat great expe~SPWRMS was <br />developed for a fraction of the cost of CROSS, but is not strictly a modular application. In its <br />present configuration, SPWRMS is not suited to provide the interface for a DSS. Much of the effort <br />that went into creating SPWRMS, however, should be useful and transportable for development of a <br />DSS. In particular, the spatial topology - the way the geographical features of the basin relate to <br />each other - beneath the GIS interface of SPWRMS could form the basis for a graphical DSS <br />interface. In addition, the relational database used by SPWRMS stores many institutional and <br />physical characteristics of the basin that would be needed by water resource planning models and <br />water quality models, <br /> <br />Any serious attempt to model the lower South Platte basin ID.l!S1 account for the tributary aquifer. <br />There is general agreement among water users of the South Platte that the current method of <br />calculating well depletions and recharge accretions gives moderately acceptable results, but leaves <br />plenty of room for improvement. Northern's Point Flow model is a step in this direction. The <br />CROSS water resources planning model is not presently configured to include well pumping and '7 <br />tributary aquifer recharge. While the CWCB intends to use the CROSS design for a new South __ \ <br />Platte DSS, this is clearly one of the major modifications that will be necessary. Both the Northern <br />District and CWRRI are starting to take a new look at the SAMSON model, considering its potential <br />as a module of a South Platte DSS. <br /> <br />SPWRMS has an effective user interface with which the Division 1 Engineers and the District <br />Commissioners are becoming familiar. While the interface is not in "ready-to-use" form for a more <br />comprehensive DSS application, it could be modified or replicated, SPWRMS databases contain, in <br />readily accessible form, much of the basic information a DSS will require. Lastly, SPWRMS is <br /> <br />04/11/95 <br />