Laserfiche WebLink
<br />001383 <br /> <br />"was a wonderful dam site, but we could <br />not find any infonna.tion as to whether <br />the geological structure was such as <br />would enable a dam to be built there." <br /> <br />After stating they had nothing <br /> <br />"which would lead us to believe that <br />water could be diverted from Bridge <br />Canyon dam" <br /> <br />but that some invention might appear making such diversion <br /> <br />possible, he stated that the filing was done for power <br /> <br />purposes. Some discussion followed between Mr, Davis and <br /> <br />Mr. Hinderlider and Mr. Rogers, the latter of whom asked <br /> <br />this pertinent question, (page 89) <br /> <br />"Mr. Rogers: What Mr. Hinderlider is <br />getting at, Mr. Davis, is would the <br />right acquired by Arizona in the dam <br />be such that Arizona could require the <br />delivery of 2-1/2 million acre feet to <br />your dam. Could that in any way, any <br />manner, work to require the Upper Basin <br />States to deliver water from the <br />Colorado River Compact when Arizona <br />isn't a signer of it, and of course that <br />is the question he wants answered. You <br />state that sinoe we are required to <br />deliver seven million five hundred thous- <br />and acre feet to Lees Ferry, then under <br />no oircumstances could you call for any <br />J(,lore, because if we deliver 7,500,000 <br />acre feet to Lees Ferry eaoh year, then <br />you could stop two million and a half <br />feet, therefore we would not be affected-_ <br />tMt is your answer to it." <br /> <br />it"> <br /> <br />This q'uery seems to be the main basis of objection, <br /> <br /> <br />if any exists. W"8 shall notioe it later, <br /> <br /> <br />The disouss;l.qn .followi.1lD' only se.rves to, c.l~~f'y <br /> <br /> <br />lv!r";-Ro'gersl statement, reaui,t1ng in -tbIJ~by oIIl!ge <br /> <br />>, <br /> <br />5. <br />