My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC06829
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
19000-19999
>
WSPC06829
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:08:00 PM
Creation date
10/9/2006 6:05:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.700
Description
Colorado River Basin General Publications - Augmentation-Weather Modification
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
4/15/1983
Author
DOI-BOR
Title
CREST - Colorado River Enhanced Snowpack Test - Program Plan
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />'0 t1vV\ <br />} 11/ <br />tf 'J,O <br /> <br />~~ <br />STATE OF COLORI\DO <br />- <br /> <br />\Ill.n 95 <br /> <br />COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD <br />Department of Natural Resources <br /> <br />J21 State Centennial 8ui Idlng <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3441 <br /> <br />Richard O. lamm <br />Governor <br /> <br />M E MaR AND U M <br /> <br />J. William McDonald <br />Director <br /> <br />David W. Walker <br />Deputy Director <br /> <br />TO: Bill McDonald <br />CREST and Related Programs File <br /> <br />FROM: Dan Law <br /> <br />DATE: September 24, 1984 <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Review of the September draft of the "1984 Evaluation <br />of Salinity Control Programs in the Colorado River <br />Basin." <br /> <br />CD <br /> <br />I have reviewed the subject report and compared it with the <br />initial draft. The Bureau has made all of our suggested changes. <br />"However, there are a few areas that still need clarification. I <br />have identified these areas below. <br /> <br />i. On page 20, the assumption on the service life of the USDA <br />program is still a matter of concern to the Work Group. It <br />should be assumed that this program will get sufficient <br />funding to rehabilitate the original salinity control work. <br /> <br />2. On page 21, the narrative under "Federal and Basin Fund <br />Economic and Financial Analysis" is very confusing and needs <br />to be rewritten. The first sentence in the third paragraph <br />is especially long and confusing. <br /> <br />3. On page 38, the third paragraph is unclear. <br /> <br />4. On page 47, the Bureau attempts to define temporary <br />increases and this is neither appropriate nor necessary. <br /> <br />5. On page 49, Reclamation has suggested that CREST is an <br />important consideration in evaluating the long term target <br />load objectives. If this is the case, a considerable amount <br />of work should be initiated on evaluating the scuM- '30c.,',,( <br />institutional, and legal problems associated with such a <br />program. <br /> <br />716 <br />con/pro <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.