Laserfiche WebLink
<br />f. " J ') 5;) <br />UU ..L <br /> <br />removal of aspen timber in western Colorado. Studies show that the com- <br />bined effects of weather modification and vegetation modification on the <br />same area increase streamflow more than if the two practices are applied <br />separ ate 1 y. <br /> <br />E. Weather Modification <br /> <br />The technology of modifying wintertime orographic cloud systems to increase <br />mountain snowpack has been developing over the past 30 years. Both <br />research and operational projects have contributed to a better understand- <br />ing of weather modification. The accumulated evidence is that seeding <br />under favorable conditions should increase seasonal snowpack 10 to 15 <br />percent and this, in turn, should increase the flow of the Colorado River <br />by at least 10 percent. Evidence about the potential for wintertime <br />orographic snowpack augmentation in the high mountains of the Colorado <br />River Basin is based largely on statistical data from past projects such <br />as the Climax and Wolf Creek Pass experiments conducted by Colorado State <br />University and Reclamation's Colorado River Basin Pilot Project. These <br />results were consistent with the physical hypothesis that seeding under <br />favorable conditions increases the precipitation efficiency of the cloud <br />systems. In addition, we have gained considerable insight into the <br />seedability of orographic cloud systems through Reclamation's Sierra <br />Cooperative Pilot Project and Colorado State University's Colorado Oro- <br />graphic Seeding Experiment. Recent advances in the technology of winter <br />orographic cloud seeding have provided knowledge on which clouds should <br />and should not be seeded and new instrumentation and techniques for <br />recognizing opportunities in real-time and reacting to them in a timely <br />manner with more effective seeding delivery systems. <br /> <br />Several major resource studies have examined the augmentation options and <br />concluded that the technology of cloud seeding for significantly increas- <br />ing snowpack and runoff is scientifically possible. It appears to be the <br />most cost-effective means for increasing water supplies, and is within <br />reach. <br /> <br />In 1974, a Department of the Interior report on Water for Energy in the <br />Upper Colorado River Basin concluded augmentation by cloud seeding was <br />feasible. In 1975, the Secretary released the comprehensive Westwide <br />Study Report on Critical Water Problems facing the 11 Western States <br />authorized by Title II of Public Law 90-537. The overall inadequacy of <br />the natural supply was recognized. The report concluded: <br /> <br />"Taking into consideration availability, quantity, quality, and <br />cost of the augmentation alternatives, weather modification <br />appears to be the most promising source of new water supply in <br />the Wes tern Un i ted States." <br /> <br />It recommended initiation of two comprehensive research projects and <br />accompanyi ng soci al-env ironmenta 1 studi es with in the decade: (1) a demon- <br />stration program in the Colorado River Basin, and (2) a cooperative pilot <br />program in the Northern Sierra Nevada. <br /> <br />12 <br />