My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC06645
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
19000-19999
>
WSPC06645
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:07:04 PM
Creation date
10/9/2006 6:00:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8272.500.10
Description
Colorado River Basin-Water Quality-Salinity-Organizations and Entities-CO Dept of Public Health-WQCC
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
3/14/1980
Author
EPA
Title
Colorado River Salinity-Water Quality Control Commission-1978 Standards-Standards and Implementation Policy Hearings-EPA Statement on Proposed Revision to Salinity Standards
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />interpretation of the Forum's recommended water quality standards for <br /> <br /> <br />salinity. The Forum's recommendation provides for temporary increases <br /> <br />above tne numeric criteria if control measures to offset these increases <br /> <br />are included in a plan of implementation. This concept evolved to address <br /> <br />two basic concerns - the hydrologic variability and its relation to <br /> <br />salinity concentration, and the fact that development activities might pro- <br /> <br />ceed ahead of salinity control projects. Since Colorado does not propose <br /> <br />to adopt the Forum's implementation plan, the provision ,for temporary in- <br /> <br />creases is not properly qualified by control measures and significantly <br /> <br />detracts from the numeric criteria. EPA's prior approval of the temporary <br /> <br />increase provision was based on the concept that a commitment to basinwide <br /> <br />implementation activities would provide the needed assurances that the num- <br /> <br />eric criteria would be maintained. Without this tie to implementation the <br /> <br />allowance of increases becomes an unacceptable provision. <br /> <br />Second, a phrase in the sentence on pages 2 and 3 of the Proposed <br /> <br />Colorado River Salinity Standards or Criteria is presented out of context <br /> <br />with prior salinity control reommendations and requirements. The sentence <br />in question reads: <br /> <br />"The provision is that the standards shall be re- <br />viewed for the purpose of modifying and adopting <br />standards consistent with the plan so that the Basin <br />states may continue to develop their compact- <br />apportioned waters while providing the best practi- <br />cable water quality in the Colorado River Basin." <br /> <br />This language is drawn from the Forum's provision on periodic review of <br /> <br />the recommended criteria and plan of implementation. <br /> <br />The phrase ". . .while providing the best practicable water quality <br /> <br />in the Colorado River Basin," appearing now as part of the salinity <br /> <br />-3- <br /> <br />1419 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.