Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The states were in disagreement as to how to proceed and how to allocate <br /> <br />the waters so as to protect the interests of each state. Chairman Hoover by the <br /> <br /> <br />conclusion of the seventh meeting suggested that perhaps the Commission was !Iso. <br /> <br /> <br />hopelessly far apart" that there was no use in proceeding. .However, they did <br /> <br /> <br />proceed, and eventually divided the Colorado River System into the Upper and <br /> <br /> <br />Lower Basins at Lee Ferry end allocated the waters of the river equally between <br /> <br /> <br />the two basins. By the end of the twenty-fifth session the Commissioners had <br /> <br />drafted and agreed upon the provisions of the Colorado River Compact. <br /> <br />The Commissioners returned to their respective states to introduce the <br /> <br /> <br />. Compact for ratification by each legislature. Unfortunately, ratification was not <br /> <br /> <br />forthcoming from all of the states. In 1928 Congress enacted the Boulder Canyon <br /> <br /> <br />Project Act, an act "to provide lor the construction of works for the I;lrotection and <br /> <br /> <br />development of the Colorado River Basin.IT Section 13 of the Act granted approval <br /> <br /> <br />to the Colorado River Compact and Section 4 provided that "no authority shall be <br /> <br />exercised hereunder and no work shall be begun and no moneys expended .,.n <br /> <br />until the seven states had ratified the compact, or until six states, including <br /> <br /> <br />C~ifornia, had ratified it and consented to waive t.he requirement in Article XI of <br /> <br /> <br />the Compact for unanimous consent. In March, 1929, the compact became <br /> <br />effective, six states having approved the compact ~~ .having waived unanimous <br /> <br /> <br />consent, 'and California having agreed. to limit her claims. Arizona refused to <br /> <br />ratily the compact until 1944. <br /> <br />There had been no agreement during the Colorado River Compact negotia- <br /> <br />tions as to how each Basin1s allocation of water would be divided among the respec- <br /> <br />tive states. In 1948 the Upper Basin states negotiated, with the consent of <br /> <br />Congress, the Upper Colorado River Basin Compact, the purpose of which was to: <br /> <br />II . . . provide for the equitable division and apportion- <br />ment of the use of the waters of the Colorado River <br />System, the use of which was apportioned in perpetuity <br />to the Upper Basin by the Colorado River Compact; to <br />establish the obligations of each State of the Upper <br />Division with respect to deliveries of water required to <br />be made at Lee Ferry by the Colorado River Compact; <br />to promote interstate comity; to remove causes of <br />pr~ent and future controversies; to secure the expedi- <br />tious agricultural and industrial development of the <br />Upper Basin, the storage of water and to protect life <br />and property from floods," Article Ha) <br /> <br />-5- <br /> <br />1433 <br />