My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC06339
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
17000-17999
>
WSPC06339
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:05:32 PM
Creation date
10/9/2006 5:48:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8272.500.10
Description
Colorado River Basin-Water Quality-Salinity-Organizations and Entities-CO Dept of Public Health-WQCC
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
3/14/1980
Title
Colorado River Salinity-Water Quality Control Commission-1978 Standards-Standards and Implementation Policy Hearings-Comments on Behalf of Chevron Shale Oil Company
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />HISTORY OF THE COLORADO RIVER COMPACT <br />AND THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER BASIN COMPACT <br /> <br />The Lower Basin states developed earlier and more rapidly than the Upper <br /> <br />Basin states. The Imperial Valley, irrigated with waters of the Colorado River, <br /> <br /> <br />became a productive agricultural center in the early 1900's. The seven Colorado <br /> <br /> <br />River Basin states became increasingly interested in settling the potential claims <br /> <br /> <br />to the waters of the Colorado River, because the Upper Basin states feared that <br /> <br /> <br />early appropriations in the Lower Basin would foreclose later development of the <br /> <br /> <br />Upper Basin under the prior appropriation doctrine. This doctrine of IIfirst in time, <br /> <br /> <br />first in rightTt was reeognized by the Supreme Court in Wyomin~ v. Colorado, 259 <br /> <br /> <br />U.S. 419 S.Ct. 552, 66 L.Ed. 999 U922) as the do~trine governing the interstate use <br /> <br /> <br />of waters in the West. The Lower Basin states were motivated toward a settlement <br /> <br />by their desire that the United States undertake dam projects (or flood protection, <br /> <br />storage, and power generation. The issue of water allocation had already become a <br /> <br /> <br />point of litigation between some of the states and the United ~tates refused to <br /> <br /> <br />invest in any federal reclamation project on the Colorado River until these <br /> <br /> <br />cantliets were resolved. <br /> <br />Negotiations on the Colorado River Compact were begun in i9i2 by the <br /> <br /> <br />Colorado River Commission, created by resolution at the August, 1920 meeting of <br /> <br /> <br />the League of the Southwest, and consisted of a representative appointed from <br /> <br /> <br />each of the seven Basin states and Herbert Hoover, then Sec~etary of Commerce, <br /> <br /> <br />who acted as Chairman, representing the United States. <br /> <br /> <br />In his opening"remarks to the Commission Hoover said: <br /> <br />"'This conference is unique in its attempt to <br />determine states' rights over so large an area by ami- <br />cable agreement. Indeed it has wider proportions than <br />this in its realization of common interest, need of joint <br />consideration, etc. in order that the greatest possible <br />benefits may be derived for the whole of our people <br />from one of the most precious possessions of our <br />countrv." Minutes and Record of the First Ei hteen <br />Sessions of t e Colorado River CommiSSlon, page 4. <br /> <br />-4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.