|
<br />., .
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />_..::.'-'--......:-:....,'.
<br />
<br />. .
<br />;'...--.---- ",
<br />
<br />. .._-'-_.._~._."
<br />
<br />- ". .
<br />. <,. ._...,~-,,'-- .'-,'
<br />
<br />,.'"'"
<br />
<br />... ,;,........ ~ ','.' .":...'\:.~:)."~':.~-,.':
<br />. '.~,:-{?i:~r.~?:::,/~' -
<br />.~. ,-., " ;..
<br />.
<br />
<br />8B3897
<br />
<br />o O~Dq"",
<br />
<br />I
<br />,
<br />,
<br />,
<br />
<br />criteri~:
<br />
<br />,
<br />1
<br />I
<br />1
<br />,
<br />I.
<br />I
<br />.j
<br />,
<br />I
<br />.I
<br />.:
<br />
<br />Q Health and safety.
<br />
<br />'::0 F't-oper"ty 10:=-s.
<br />
<br />o EconoRlic disruption.
<br />
<br />a Social disruption.
<br />
<br />I
<br />j
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />US€? o.f t:',-2 ma+':t-i:-: Enables svstenl~;.tic .::<.ncl spec:tfi.:: identifica,tiorl
<br />of, not 0:11y the potential iRlplications of hazard occurrence, but
<br />also the additional ini:ormation required .to assess implications
<br />of occrre0~e in more specific terms. Results may be aggregatecj,
<br />or clust:2;-ed, subseqLiently into geriEt-.:;-d "landslide pr-oblems",
<br />and/or p~ioritized. The matrix method could be modified to
<br />address additional loss criteria, or dissaggregations of the ones
<br />used ir,t2 Gore specific criteria.
<br />
<br />i
<br />j
<br />I
<br />,
<br />i
<br />f
<br />
<br />ImplicatlorlS of hazard occurrence were reviewed by DODES staf~:
<br />and judgemental analysis pe~fQrmed catagorizirl9 iRlplications as
<br />relatively high~ medium, and low priority. Only the hiqh
<br />priority implicatiol1S have beerl subjected to the unmet needs
<br />analysis. A judgement is required as to whether proposed action
<br />recommenci2tions adequately address medium and low prior-ity
<br />implicatic!ilS., Qr~ \o'Jhett:er €....dc!:l.t.ionEd t-eCOiHHH:?ndation-:-:. ~,peci+3.c:~.11y
<br />addressir1~ ttlEse are warral1ted.
<br />
<br />f
<br />
<br />The meth'::',j enables planner.s and 2\dministl'~a.tOt"-'s f'esponsible -tDf'
<br />hazard ffi2nagenlent to perfor-m analyses wl1ich are useful,
<br />regardless of the level of resources available fQ~ the effort.
<br />The method allows for iterative analyses to be performed as
<br />additional q~estions are specified~ and resources (i.e. funejing,
<br />time, and in--depth substarltive expertise) required for mare in-
<br />deptt1 analyses become available.
<br />
<br />j
<br />'.
<br />
<br />:1
<br />"
<br />II
<br />'I
<br />II
<br />,I
<br />I,
<br />:1
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />!Qs~I!E!~eI!Q~ QE ~~~sI ~SSQ2
<br />
<br />A second matriK was developed and used to evaluate systematically
<br />the capability of the e~(istir'g l,azard mitigation system to
<br />addr'Ess tt1e identified "18.nclslide problE.ms". F't-oblems I;-,.lhich 2x'e
<br />not being addressed adequately by the presel1t mitigation system
<br />are identified. Additional actions strengthening the present
<br />tlazard mitigation system~ i.e. l\nmet fleeds~ ther1 are recommecfed
<br />for accomplishment by l.ocal, state, and federal resources and
<br />initiatives. Table II pr-esents an example Df the matrix for the
<br />same three potentially exposed activities analyzed ir) Table I,
<br />a.bovea
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />.
<br />
|