Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />r <br />i <br /> <br />.;; <br />I <br />1: <br />I: <br />I' <br />H <br />,. <br />i' <br />:l <br />i~ <br />.: <br />:' <br />.!! <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />,. <br />E <br />,- <br />" <br />'I: <br />Ii <br />1\ <br /> <br />i' <br /> <br />;1 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />__"~""""'>o'. <br /> <br />.._--~~, --..., ,--"-_._~-....:..._- . ...'-'-,.---,-- <br /> <br />- ------'---, .-- <br /> <br />:'.,_.___~~e__ <br /> <br />".-' <br /> <br />'_ :)~:~!~~~;~o~; <br /> <br />.003lJ96 <br /> <br />";., "-f'<<. <br />>--_,........:., "T~T,f' <br />/ <br /> <br />To: Colcl-~jO Landslide Hazar-d Mitioation Plan Pr'oject Team <br /> <br />From: GE0,-~e Weber~ Uni~ersity (]f Colorado (556-2816) <br /> <br />D.,te: <br /> <br />. c_~ <br />~ ,-' ~ <br /> <br />1987" <br /> <br />1'13\' <br /> <br />Q86EI ~Q8tl~~ t6ts8L <br />Y~~sI ~ssQ~ IQs~IIEl~aIIQ~ <br />hQbQ8aQQ ~IaIs be~Q~blQs ~a~e8Q ~lIl~aIlQ~ tbe~ <br /> <br />E:JJBE:Q9g <br /> <br />The pur~~3e of this workinq paper 15 to identify fOF eac~j <br />study =,1 -::e: <br /> <br />caS'2 <br /> <br />o Hl'~3n activities potentially threatened due ~o landslide <br />I'~:ar-d in the project's three case study si~es wi,ic:h have <br />I~l;h priority implications. <br /> <br />(3 Uf-:;":":-et needs~ <br /> <br />o Explanation of the analytical process used for identifying <br />L\1~~;1ei:. r1eed-r,;. <br /> <br />QsEl~lIIQ~ QE Y~~sI ~ssQ~ <br /> <br />Un met needs are actions addressirlg specific ~laz&rd related <br />problem5. 'T'he r-ecoinmendaticns t13vepoterltial to str-engthen the <br />existing tl2zard response syst~m. These actions are recommended <br />for sut)s~querlt evaluatiorl by the p~'oject team and appropriate <br />state ager"!cy persoflnel, arId cOl1sider2tion for imp~ementation by <br />l,:)ca 1 CGi'l"If1"!Un i tie-:=. i'.:\nd st a. t(~ gCJ\let"~fiCf!ent ~ . <br /> <br />s~tbe~aIIQ~ QE 6~6biIl~eb t8Q~s~~ E8QQY~1~~ <br />lQs~IlEI~6IIQN QE Y~~sI ~ssQ~ <br /> <br />IQs~IIEI~eIIQ~ QE tQIs~I16b 1~Ebl~6IIQ~~ QE ~a~e8Q Q~~Y88s~~s <br />e~Q eQQIIIQ~eb I~EQ8~eIIQ~ 8sQ~18s~sNI~ <br /> <br />H m2tr-i.~< +Ot-. E.'vaJu2.ting potential imp,::!cts iJ.f j'lazar'd Dccur-'-f.:-nC:t? <br />for each hUinan activity located il' a hazar-d zone was developed. <br />A comple-ted example for t~lree different exposed activities is <br />provided irl l"able I. <br /> <br />Ttle first colLlmn lists specific humar'J activities <br />exposed to hazard Qccurrerlce. An analysis is then <br />identifying, in as specific terms as possible within <br />o.f information available to tl"\e effort, the <br />implications of tlBzard occurrence for each of four <br /> <br />rJDtenti all y <br />pE-~t-fOt-mf?d <br />constt-ai nts <br />potential <br />evaluative <br />