My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC05613
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
17000-17999
>
WSPC05613
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 10:16:53 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 5:24:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.500
Description
Colorado River - Colorado River Basin - Colorado River Basin General Strategy
State
CO
Date
5/9/1983
Author
Not Available
Title
Arizona/California/Nevada Compromise on Hoover Power Rates (Proposed Amendments to S. 268)
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~. , 00 i ~ 5 7 <br />.' . <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />May 9, 1983 <br /> <br />Section by section .~alysis of Suggested <br />Amendments to 5.268 Proposed. by Arizona Power <br />Authority, the Colorado River Commission of <br />the state of Nevada, The Metropolitan Water <br />District of Southern California, and the Southern <br />California Edison Company <br /> <br />General: Paragraphs 1 to 8 of the suggested amend- <br />ments recommend .that the existing provisions of 5.268 be styled <br />as "Title I" and renumbered beginning with section 101. Addi- <br />tionally, to clarify that Title I does not apply to Title II <br />which presents proposals related to the Boulder Canyon Project <br />and related matters, a new section 109 would expressly disclaim <br />the application of Title I to any project authorized or affected <br />by Title II. <br /> <br />The following paragraphs discuss L~e proposed provi- <br />sions of Title II: <br /> <br />SEC. 201: (a) Would provide authority for the <br />Secretary of the Interior to undertake the Uprating Program and <br />the improvement of Visitor Facilities. Prompt authorization of <br />the Uprating Program is necessary both to enable post-198? <br />marketing of an enhanced Boulder Canyon resource and to avoid <br />potential waste that would result from failure to integrate the <br />on-going program of replacing worn generating machinery at <br />Boover powerplant with the' proposed Uprating Program which is <br />designed to increase the generating capacity of these same <br />units. <br /> <br />. (b) would provide authority for construction of <br />a Colorado River bridge crossing, but excludes such crossing <br />from the Boulder Canyon Project and expressly specifies that it <br />shall be neither funded nor reoaid from the Colorado River Dam <br />Fund or the Lower Colorado River Basin Develooment Fund since <br />such a facility is more properly funded from highway funds. <br /> <br />SEC. 202: (a) Clause (1) of section 403(c) of the <br />Colorado River Basin ProJect Act of 1968 ("Basin Project Act") <br />would be revised to limit its applicability to revenues collected <br />from Title .111 facilities to completion of repayment of the <br />Central Arizona Project. <br /> <br />(b) The proposed revision of clause (2) of <br />section 403(c) of the Basin Project Act preserves the concept <br />that surplus federal revenues from the Boulder Canyon and <br />Parker-Davis projects, after repayment thereof, are to be <br /> <br />-1- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.