WSPC05386 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~,. Oa0392 into Mexico irrigating some lands there and then back into the United States. The Gila Canal, which diverts from the left side of Imperial Dam, will irrigate the Gila Project in Arizona. These works would not have been feasible without the regulated water supplies provided by the reservoirs heretofore cited, which could not have been built without the Colorado River Compact. Bullshead reservoir will enable the above consumptive uses to take place in the lower basin without interference with the gen., eration of hydroelectric ene;>gy at Hoover Dam. -------- The Colorado River Compact allo~~ed ~o ~he lower basin 8,500,000 acre- ~eet of beneficial consumptive use, and to the upper basin 7,500,000 acre-feet of ,eneficial consumptive use per year, the division point between the two basins being i,ee Ferry, Arizona. The compact also provided that the upper basin states would not C2~lete the flow of the river at Lee Ferry below 75,000,000 acre-feet in successive 'G-year periods. In 1948 a compact was consummated among the states of the upper basin, "l'J ?ona, Colorado, New MeXico, Utah, and Wyoming. The compact apportioned to each. st&te what was considered its equitable share of the 7,500,000 acre-feet of benefic~al consumptive use per annum apportioned to the upper basin by the Colorado River Com- pact. In order for this obligation to be met and for ,the upper basin to beneficially consume 7,500,000 acre-feet per annum, najor storage must be provided on the main stem of the Colorado River in the upper basin and on the main tributaries thereof. This storage vnll largely equate the remaining flow of water after the.upper basin utilizes its full apportionment. A report on the so-called Colorado River Storage Project has been sub- mitted to the Secretary of the Interior by the U. S. Bureau of rtecl~nation. The units of that proposed project are indicated on the map. When and if those units and the>Bridge Canyon reservoir in the lower basin are constructed, the flow of the Colorado River below the major developments in the upper basin .nll be largely equated and large amounts of hydroelectric energy will be generated, for which there is a rapidly growing market. Indicated on the map is the additional depletion of the water supply at Lee Ferry which can be permitted to take place by man's ~ctivities in the upper basin, the amount being 5,100,000 acre-feet per year. Suoh depletion .nll be the result of 'Ghe construction of a multitude of projects, principally in the four upper basin states, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming. Little of the proposed development in the upper basin which has been described above would have been possible without the Colorado River Compact and the Upper Colorado River Compact. LIajor development in the upper basin had reached a stand-still because of the lack of apportionment of the use of the waters of the Colorado River among the states. Actually, the Commissioner of Reclamation had in- dicated that he could not find a dependable water supply for any major project, which it is his function to do under the 1939 Reclamation Act, unless the upper basin sta~ apportioned the upper basin's share of the beneficial consumptive use of the Colorado River among themselves. The members of the Upper Colorado River Co~~ission, which vas created by the Upper Colorado River Compact, are working harmoniously together. The Commission is also working harmoniously rn th relevant governmental agencies to bring about a rational development of the upper basin of the Colorado River, which could not have been done without the two compacts. The Colorado River Compact of 1922 started a chain reaction with re- spect to the negotiation and consummation of compacts, which is still in process. -5-