WSPC05058 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

O t. <'. ') 8 4 U.lv water to agriculture at reduced costs. Such projects are probably the only way of significantly increasing the amount of irrigated acreage in the state, aside from increased use of finite ground water resources. However, the future of federal reclamation projects has been clouded by changes in federal water policies, and therefore the extent to which additional. water will be consumed by irrigated agriculture is uncertain. In addition to the concern for agriculture, the state has articulated a number of other related social or environmental concerns to which water is alleged to have a connection. Most of these concerns are not measureable in dollar values, or cannot otherwise be accommodated in a market transfer of water. For example, one concern is for the continued balance in the state's economy. Five separate sectors of the Colorado economy (agriculture, tourism, manufacturing, mining, and government) each contribute a billion dollars or more to the Colorado economy. There is concern that market economics not be permitted to let agriculture become a weakened partner in maintenance of this balance, and a perception that if water flows only uphill toward money, it will flow away from agriculture, and thus upset the state's balanced and stable economic base. The final factor influencing the future demand for water in Colorado is the growing concern for the maintenance and protection of the "public interest" values in water, briefly noted above in the description of the water rights system. Recent trends and future projections show that increases in disposable income and leisure time will lead to increased demands on the recreational waters of the state. Outdoor activities which wholly or partially depend on water, such as fishing, boating, hiking, kayaking, hunting, etc" have increased substantially in the last few i2-