Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(j ~/I) 718 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Fish and Wildlife Service <br />Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program <br />Accomplishments for Fiscal Year 1994 <br /> <br />Big Sandy Unit <br /> <br />Mitigation planning for the Big Sandy Project continues with SCS towards the fulfillment of <br />mitigating wetlands being affected by the Salinity Control Program (SCP). Accomplishments <br />of this voluntary wetland replacement program has had some success, but falls short in fully <br />mitigating project impacts. Mitigation has been primarily associated with construction of <br />project features, such as creating wetlands associated with the construction of center pivot <br />reserve water pits, and replacing lost waterfowl nesting habitat within corners adjacent to the <br />circles, Due to the drought, the full extent of dewatering by the project by replacement of the <br />surface irrigation system with center pivots sprinklers is not fully known. <br /> <br />The project's Environment Impact Statement indicated that wetland impacts would be <br />significant, totaling about 3,775 acres, If this is the case, we do not believe that wetland <br />losses can be dlitigated through the voluntary replacement program that is presently in place, <br />Many of the wetlands that are being affected by dewatering are on withdrawn public lands <br />administered by the Bureau of Land ManagementJBureau of Reclamation, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The foreseen prohibition that project funds can not be used to mitig~te project impacts on <br />public lands has, and will continue to, preclude that ability to mitigate project impacts <br />associated with these lands. These lands and the recently Grandy Ranch purchased by The <br />Nature Conservancy, provide excellent opportunity to mitigate wetlands impacted by the <br />project. However, we believe to fully mitigation project impacts that the flexibility to use <br />adjacent public lands and increasing or fully underwriting project's mitigation commitment will <br />be necessary, <br /> <br />Moapa Valley Unit <br /> <br />The Record of Decision (ROD) for the Moapa Valley Unit, Nevada, issued February 22, <br />1993, by the Soil Conservation Service (SCS), proposed to implement the recommended plan <br />of action, The Fish and Wildlife Service's (Service) Nevada State Office has expressed <br />concern regarding the lack of assurance that compensation would be provided for impacts to <br />wetlands.,.lpst as a result of the project. Since issuance of the ROD, the Muddy Valley <br />Irrigation Company, the principal in the project area, withdrew their support, The Service <br />received a letter from the SCS dated March 28, 1994, stating the SCS will not be <br />implementing the Moapa Valley Unit of the Colorado River Salinity Control Program. The <br />SCS has terminated activities on the project and ceased further expenditures for technical <br />assistance under the program in Moapa Valley, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />8 <br />