Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />,I <br />I <br />!I <br />I <br />,. <br />I <br />. <br /> <br />OU210<1 <br /> <br />Hydrosphere's Colorado River Model <br /> <br />December 29, 1993 <br />Page II <br /> <br />Future versions of the model may include the capability to simulate lagged return flows <br />to remote river reaches. This upgrade will depend on the feedback we receive from our <br />customers. <br /> <br />Monthly Distribution of Depletions <br /> <br />The monthly depletions used in the model were derived by multiplying the annual <br />depletion by a distribution factor for each month. Each use can have a different distribution <br />factor. The distribution factors used in the baseline configuration of the model are taken from <br />the USBR 1991 AOP data set. These factors may be modified in the model. <br /> <br />Future Projected Depletions <br /> <br />The future depletion estimates used in Hydrosphere's Colorado River Model have been <br />obtained, in most part, from the USBR's 1991 AOP. These were developed by the Bureau <br />through model studies that included consideration of water supply, legal entitlement, current <br />and expected delivery capacity, and expected development of water-using projects. <br /> <br />I <br />. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The model will accommodate modifications to the depletion estimates to simulate any <br />demand scenario. Depletions can be simulated at a constant level or as a time series of <br />increasing values. Constant depletions are used to evaluate scenarios which assume that full <br />depletion capabilities are attained starting from the first year of simulation (such as a <br />"buildout" scenario). Increasing future depletion estimates can be used to evaluate scenarios <br />where depletions are expected to increase due to increasing delivery capacities or other <br />reasons, usually defined over a planning horizon that extends 20 to 40 years into the future. <br /> <br />When short term dynamic analyses are made, depletions in the initial year of the model <br />simulation are usually set to current conditions as defined by the last year for which observed <br />depletions are available, which in the current data set is 1992. Depletion estimates then change <br />in the following years through 2040 according to the USBR 1991 AOP data set: <br /> <br />1992 (initial year) <br />1993 <br />1994 <br />1995 <br />2000 <br />2010 <br />2020 <br />2030 <br />2040 <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />Depletions may be held constant between the years in which changes are specified or <br />they may be interpolated. <br /> <br />Previous analyses with Hydrosphere's Colorado River Model have adapted the USBR <br />1991 AOP depletions to represent three levels of projected depletions -- "low", "medium" and <br />"high" (Booker, 1992). The low depletion level assumes constantdemand (no growth) as <br />represented by the USBR schedule for 1992, and deliveries to CAP limited at 745 kaf for most <br />years. The medium depletion level assumes demand growth is represented by the USBR <br />schedule for years 1992 to 2030, but with agricultural uses fixed at 1992 levels. The total <br />CAP depletion is assumed to start with 543 kaf, increase quickly to 900-950 kaf, and jump to <br />1,116 kaf in 2010. The high depletion level assumes demand growth represented by the USBR <br />schedule for years 1992 to 2030. CAP demands grow to 1,666 kaf in the 3rd year, and to the <br /> <br />Hydrosphere Resource Consultants 1002 Walnut Suite 200 Boulder, Colorado 80302 <br />