Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />il <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />il <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />002103 <br /> <br />Hydrosphere's Colorado River Model <br /> <br />December 29, 1993 <br />Page 10 <br /> <br />DEPLETIONS <br /> <br />Water use estimates used in Hydrosphere's Colorado River Model are stated in terms of <br />"depletion", the amount of water delivered for use less the amount of water that returns to the <br />river after use. Depletions at 265 points in the Colorado River basin are simulated in <br />Hydrosphere's Colorado River Model. Appendix A contains a listing of the depletion points. <br /> <br />Historic depletion estimates from 1982 to 1990, as well as future projected depletion <br />estimates are available for use in the model. These estimates have, for the most part, been <br />derived from data developed by the USBR for its 1991 Annual Operating Plan (AOP), dated <br />July 22, 1991 (USBR, 1991). <br /> <br />The model allows limited modification to the depletions via changes in the annual <br />amounts, return flow percentages, monthly distributions and relative priorities. The current <br />. version of the model does not allow the user to add or remove depletions from the network. <br />Future versions of the model will certainly have more demand resolution and may incorporate <br />more flexibility for network modification; these upgrades will be highly dependent on the types <br />of analyses sought by our customers. <br /> <br />The following subsections provide a general discussion of how the depletions are <br />handled in the model and more specific discussions of how CAP and MWD depletions are <br />represented. <br /> <br />Diversion. Depletion and Return Flow <br /> <br />The USBR's CRSM can simulate lagged return flows accruing to specified points below <br />the point of diversion. Return flow percentages, lag times (up to ten months from the' time of <br />diversion) and points of return are specified in the CRSM data files. In the 1991 AOP data set <br />all return flows are specified to return in the month of their diversion (Le. there are no lagged <br />returns). Return flows for about half of the approximately 120 diversions accrue above the <br />immediate downstream diversion point. Most of the rest of the return flows accrue before the <br />second downstream diversion point. In three cases return flows accrue to the next sequential <br />reach (as opposed to the next diversion point within the same reach) and there are intervening <br />inflows. In one case, an export from the Dolores River to the San Juan River, return flows <br />accrue to a completely different basin. <br /> <br />This representation of the system was simplified in developing Hydrosphere's Colorado <br />River Model. With one exception, the model simulates depletions at diversion points. The <br />exception is the Dolores/San Juan export that is simulated as a diversion and return flow. <br />Simulation of depletions represents an implicit assumption that return flows accrue above the <br />next diversion point with no lag. This assumption is correct for about half of the diversion <br />points in the CRSM data set. For the diversion points where this assumption is not correct the <br />impact will be to overstate water availability (understate environmental impacts) between the <br />diversion point and the point at which its return flows actually accrue. Because the overall <br />water budget is not affected, the principal result is a reduction in the precision with which the <br />spatial distribution of shortages are represented. Most of the diversions with remote return <br />flows are small, so that even this effect should be minimal. <br /> <br />Hydrosphere Resource COD.8ultants 1002 Walnut Suite 200 Boulder, Colorado 80302 <br />