WSPC04000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

OO~1f() November 18, 1996 , Page 3 · Exports probably should have been included in the Phase 2 model. Boyle should model Dome Creek Ditch explicitly. If the ditch is on an unmodeled stream, a new tributary is required; since no other baseflow nodes have been added to the model, effort required to add a tributary is covered by the scope for baseflow generation. · Snowmaking use which is explicitly modeled in Phase 2 must be subtracted from the "Other Uses" quantified by Luis Garcia. · Three aggregated M&I nodes, corresponding to HUCs 14050001, 14050002, and 14050003, are appropriate. This level of spatial aggregation is consistent with the location information available for other uses in Garcia's primary data sources. · Monthly CU calculations can be removed from Exhibit I; Exhibit 3 can be simplified by presenting information on HUC basis only. · The task memo should mention that annual demand was distributed uniformly across 12 months. . The difference between recorded diversions for the Craig and Hayden power stations, and the hydrothermal electric use values cited in Task Memorandum 2.09-12 should be mentioned under "Comments and Concerns." Task 3.11 . Aggregate Reservoirs and Stockponds Roger Sonnichsen presented a preliminary table showing the spatial distribution of reservoirs and stockponds and the decreed storage associated with each group. Comments included: . Lake Elbert should not be modeled explicitly, as that would require collecting physical data and operating rules. Boyle should check to see whether Rti documented their reason for excluding it from Phase 2, and include that information in the memo. . Because of the recent database refresh, Roger should re-execute the query for reservoir information. . The proposed aggregation into three nodes corresponding to HUCs 14050001, 14050002, and 14050003 is appropriate. Critique of CRDSS components This memorandum was briefly discussed. The State asked for clarification on several items but did not suggest changes. Ray Bennett said that the memo addressed the kinds of issues he had in mind when he proposed this monthly report. Other items The State had no changes on the invoice and progress report. Minutes of the previous progress meeting were not discussed. The group adjourned a little before noon.