Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />UOOiiBZ <br /> <br />in CFS was plotted over the full time period of 35 days and is illustrated in Figure <br />12a. <br /> <br />Return Flow to Platte River <br />from Rectangular Basin <br /> <br />ii)0.04 <br />u. <br />U <br />_0.03 <br />~ <br />.!:l 0.02 <br />u. <br />" <br />100 0.01 <br />::l <br />~ 0 <br /> <br /> <br />o 5 <br />101520 <br />25 30 35 <br />Time (Days) <br /> <br />Figure 12a: Return Flow to Platte River due to Recharge <br /> <br />The return flow showed a steady increase during the recharge period. The <br />maximum return flow occured at 25 days, five days after recharge was <br />terminated. This maximum return flow value was 0.0388 CFS. The overall <br />return flow to the river was found by integrating the return flow curve over the <br />entire time period of 35 days. The total return flow for the 35 day period was <br />71,224.6 cubic feet This represents 17.1 % of the total water recharged of <br />416,966 cubic feet The trend of Figure 12a suggests that the return flow would <br />continue well past the 35 day extent of the plot The continuing return flow past <br />the 35 day point is illustrated in Figure 12b. The overall return flow was again <br />calculated by integrating the return flow curve over the 75 day time period. The <br />total return flow increased to 133,607 cubic feet This represents only 32% of <br />the total water recharge. It is evident that the return flow to the river would <br />continue until the groundwater mound was fully dissipated. <br /> <br />H <br /> <br />...~ <br />