My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC03939
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
16000-16999
>
WSPC03939
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:37:05 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 4:17:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8460.500
Description
Platte River Basin - Endangered Species Issues - South Platte Recovery Program
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
12/5/1995
Author
Matthew J Cook
Title
South Platte Agreement - Groundwater Recharge as Augmentation for Restoring Wetlands Along the Central Platte River Nebraska - Final Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />. <br />I <br />. <br />I <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />000681 <br /> <br />the Rowe Sanctuary site. The overall difference in mound heights due to a <br />:hange in specific yield was small. <br />The transmissivity calculated for the recharge basin location was 1710 <br />'e/day. It was found as a combination of the soil permeability, K, of 22.5 fUday <br />3nd the thickness of the unconfined aquifer of 76 feet. As the aquifer thickness <br />Nas an accurate value obtained from the U,S. Geological Survey, the focus of <br />he transmissivity sensitivity analysis was with the influence of varying the <br />)ermeability, K. Figures 11 a and 11 b illustrate the effect of a change in the <br />)ermeability and therefore, the transmissivity on the mound height at the center <br />)f the basin and at a distance of 300 feet. The analysis used a vertical plane of <br />30 degrees to eliminate the influence of the river. The thickness of the aquifer <br />vas held constant at 76 feet. <br /> <br />Sensitivity Analysis of Transmissivity <br />Effect on Mound Hei9ht @ Center <br /> <br />r- <br /> <br />Sensitivity Analysis of Transmissivity <br />Effect on Mound Height @ 300 n <br /> <br />g 0.89 <br />.! 0.88 <br />8 <br />= 0.87 <br />. <br />t 0.86 <br />. <br />.; 0.85 <br />c <br />~ 0.84 <br />~ ~ n ~ M ~ <br />Hydraulic Conductivity (ft/day) <br /> <br />g <br />~2.4 <br />. <br />.. <br />023 I"--- <br />lJ . <br />~ 2.2 <br />" <br />~2.1 <br />. <br />~ <br />~ 2 <br />, <br />II ~ <br /> <br />..... <br /> <br />21 n ~ 24 <br />Hydraulic Conductivity (ft/day) <br /> <br />25 <br /> <br />'igure 11a: Effect of Mound Height at Center Figure 11b: Effect of Mound Ht at 300 ft <br /> <br />-he mound height both at the center of the basin and at a distance of 300 ft <br />lecreased as the soil permeability or hydraulic conductivity was increased over <br />he maximum range of values for the Rowe Sanctuary site. The overall <br />Iifference in mound heights due to a change in permeability was small. <br />4.5.5 Calculation of Return Flows to The Platte River <br />An analysis of the return flow to the Platte River for the 20 day recharge <br />.eriod and the 15 day recession period was performed for the recharge basin <br />lesign at the Rowe Sanctuary site. The amount of return flow to the Platte River <br /> <br />23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.