Laserfiche WebLink
<br />000454 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />dams and reservoirs; permitting of water wells; licensing of water well construction <br />contractors; collecting streamflow data on rivers and streams and maintaining the <br />records; reviewing and commenting as necessary on all Water Court applications <br />submitted to the seven water courts for the adjudication of water rights; <br />administration of interstate compacts and intrastate water rights, and the official <br />records documenting the water deliveries thereto. In addition, DWR has rule <br />making responsibilities; measures snowpack data and makes predictions as to <br />probable runoff; and reviews proposed subdivisions and other substitute water <br />supply plans. <br /> <br />Specific Work Units <br />In each of the seven major drainages in the state there is a field office with staff <br />who administer water rights and respond to public inquiries and concerns relating <br />to the administration of water in the state. There are approximately 260 <br />employees among these water districts and the Denver office. <br /> <br />Document Access Requirements <br />The first focus of imaging is water well permitting. The second focus will be <br />diversion records and the third, court cases. While information gathered about <br />other processes and documents is included herein, the impact of imaging on <br />timeliness and process steps is limited to the water well permitting process. In <br />1994 the Unisys Corporation reviewed imaging technology for the State Engineer's <br />Office. After reviewing the business processes, the study concluded that, "... the <br />DNR Well Permit staff is a well run and effectively managed business unit. No <br />changes are recommended to management policy or structure as a result of this <br />study. " <br /> <br />The division recently re-engineered the process for well permitting in four major <br /> <br />ways: <br /> <br />Significant modification of workflow processes, resulting in fewer return of <br />application to the applicant. <br />Revision and documentation of permitting policies and processes so that the <br />division's water evaluators have a more thorough understanding of both. <br />This has meant greater consistency in permit review. <br />Increased latitude given to well-permit evaluators to reconcile obvious <br />application errors or anomalies. In many case an evaluator can supply <br />information more efficiently and accurately than can the applicant. The <br />latitude allows the evaluator to supply missing or correct clearly erroneous <br />information without bothering the applicant. This speeds up the permitting <br />process. <br />Complete re-design of the well-permit application form. The applicant finds <br />the form less confusing because it relates specifically to his/her needs, and <br />forms now arrive with fewer errors. <br /> <br />59 <br />