My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC03680
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
16000-16999
>
WSPC03680
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:35:56 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 4:07:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
5000.300
Description
Flood Protection Section - Mudflow Mitigation Plan - 1987
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
1/1/1987
Title
Colorado Landslide Hazard Mitigation Plan - 1987 - Preliminary Draft
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />002880 <br /> <br />fall somewhere between $500,000 and $1 million. The 1981 debris <br />flows in Glenwood Springs caused approximately $100,000 in <br />damages. <br />2. Landslides caused approximately $300,000 in damages in 1984, and <br />over $500,000 in damages in unincorporated Garfield County in <br />1985. In May, 1985, 20 county roads were blocked by landslides, <br />and Baxter Pass had to be closed. In May, 1985, Garfield County <br />also recorded the largest mudslide in Colorado history, a <br />175-foot thick mass of debris that was a mile long and 1,000 <br />feet wide. <br />3. In addition to direct damages, other economic impacts include <br />loss of tourist trade due to media coverage of events and fish <br />kill in the Roaring Fork River and other streams, although these <br />losses are undocumented. <br />4. The "hidden" impacts of debris flows are documented in a 1986 <br />report by the Mt. Sopris Soil Conservation Board and Marian <br />Smith, "Debris Flow Costs and Inventory of City of Glenwood <br />Springs Area." Some of these costs are: <br />a) trauma, and the stress induced by recurring fears in some <br />residents when thunderstorms occur, <br />b) homeowner costs of clean up and repair, including boots, <br />gloves and tools, and damage to furnaces and appliance <br />motors, <br />c) the loss of landscaping, acquired over many years and too <br />costly to replace all at once, and <br />d). irreplaceable personal possessions such as clothes, books, <br />family photos, etc. <br /> <br />D. Population at Risk (also see Hazard Analysis, Appendix 1) <br />1. Threat areas identified in this hazard analysis are based on <br />historical frequency and geotechnical studies (see References, <br />Appendix 8). This does not imply that damages from future <br />events will be experienced in or confined to the areas <br />identified. In general, although most parts of the city are <br />vulnerable to debris flows, the threat is greatest to people and <br />property on the upper parts of debris fans, with vulnerabil ity <br />decreasing to those lowest on the fans. <br /> <br />- 95 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.