Laserfiche WebLink
<br />January 2, 1997 <br /> <br />February 14, 1997 . <br /> <br />March 6, 1997 <br /> <br />July 8, 1997 <br /> <br />August 5, 1997 <br /> <br />August 29,1997 <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />Still" Agreement, which is extended to February 11, <br />1997. .. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />.' <br />-I <br /> <br />Modification No. 002 of the Assistance Agreement for <br />the 'ute Mountain Ute Tribe to provide engineering <br />services on alternatives analyses was signed by the Ute <br />Mountain Ute Tribe and Reclamation. <br /> <br />Fifth RomerlSchoettler meeting. Representatives from <br />area water conservancy district boards, associated <br />attorneys, land owners, etc., turnout to express their <br />concerns with the suggestion of using a portion of their <br />water to satisfy needs I purposes of the ALP. Members <br />of both Tribes expressed their views, for and against <br />the project. The proponents and Citizen Coalition <br />were asked to specify, on or before the upcoming <br />March 6 m~eting, the date by which they could <br />produce a "conceptual" structural and non-structural <br />alternative (respectively). <br /> <br />Sixth RomerlSchoett1er meeting. The focus ofthe <br />meeting was to provide information on project <br />purposes, needs, and costs, and on how power <br />revenues are assigned to the project being given by <br />Reclamation. EP A gives a presentation on selenium <br />water quality issues in the San Juan. Because no dates <br />were given for.,each group to present an alternative, the <br />RomerlSchoettler meetings were put "on hold" until <br />both the Citizens' Coalition and the Project Proponents <br />could submit alternatives to the ALP. The project <br />proponents committed to present a structural <br />alternative, The Citizens' Coalition was asked for a <br />commitment by April 7 regarding their willingness to <br />present a conceptual non-structural alternative by <br />June 1. <br /> <br />Proponents' alternative released through a press <br />conference by the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe, Southern <br />Ute Indian Tribe, and members of the Colorado and <br />New Mexico congressional delegations. <br /> <br />Citizens Coalition released its Animas River <br />conceptual alternative in a press conference. <br /> <br />Draft ALP Reconciliation Plan, known as ALP-Lite, <br />completed by a Ute Mountain Ute contractor. <br /> <br />1-9 <br />